H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Janette Husarova vs Natalia Medvedeva H2H: 1-0
Janette Husarova holds a 1–0 lead over Natalia Medvedeva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Janette Husarova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Janette Husarova won the 1996 Amelia Island third round 6-4 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 52
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 54
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 1996* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Janette Husarova | 6-4 7-6 | Natalia Medvedeva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janette Husarova | #1,055 | #31 | 1,006 | 1,737 | 79 | 109 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Natalia Medvedeva | #387 | #23 | 295 | 1,881 | 111 | 111 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Janette Husarova | Natalia Medvedeva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #317 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #67 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #56 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1993 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #82 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #83 | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1994 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #145 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #102 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #23 | 1,870 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1996 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #57 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1997 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #375 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,694 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1998 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #127 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,682 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #388 | 1,661 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #149 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2001 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2002 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #33 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2003 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #126 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2005 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #366 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |