H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Janette Husarova vs Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie H2H: 0-2
Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie holds a 2–0 lead over Janette Husarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie won the 2001 Australian Open second round 6-1 6-7(3) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 52
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
Age 53
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2001* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | 6-1 6-7(3) 6-1 | Janette Husarova | Match data |
| May 27, 1998* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | 6-2 4-6 6-3 | Janette Husarova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janette Husarova | #1,055 | #31 | 1,006 | 1,737 | 79 | 109 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | — | — | — | 1,961 | 186 | 180 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Janette Husarova | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1993 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #82 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1994 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #145 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–15 | 46.4% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #102 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #375 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 31–15 | 67.4% | — | 1,849 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1998 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #127 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 37–26 | 58.7% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 18–25 | 41.9% | — | 1,696 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #149 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,832 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2001 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 20–24 | 45.5% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2002 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #33 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 9–17 | 34.6% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2003 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #126 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2005 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #366 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 4 |