H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Janette Husarova vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 0-1

Sandra Cecchini holds a 1–0 lead over Janette Husarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sandra Cecchini leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sandra Cecchini won the 1996 Maria Lankowitz round of 16 4-6 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Janette Husarova
SVK Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sandra Cecchini #98 4-6 6-4 6-4 Janette Husarova #102 Match data Aug 9, 1996* R16 Maria Lankowitz Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Janette Husarova #1,055 #31 1,006 1,737 79 109 42.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,936 300 217 58.0% 0 0 0 2 9 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Janette Husarova Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,484 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,496 0 0
19 1993 3–1 75.0% #82 1,547 0 0 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1994 6–13 31.6% #145 1,508 0 0 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1995 1–5 16.7% #102 1,477 0 0 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,633 0 3
22 1996 12–14 46.2% #76 1,544 0 0 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,859 0 5
23 1997 1–2 33.3% #375 1,541 0 0 1988 34–15 69.4% #21 1,843 0 7
24 1998 5–9 35.7% #127 1,524 0 0 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 1999 0–3 0.0% #216 1,502 0 0 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,814 0 9
26 2000 3–5 37.5% #149 1,489 0 0 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,773 0 10
27 2001 10–15 40.0% #72 1,526 0 0 1992 24–16 60.0% #34 1,823 0 11
28 2002 28–24 53.8% #33 1,716 0 0 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,726 0 11
29 2003 7–16 30.4% #126 1,578 0 0 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 2004 1–1 50.0% #205 1,589 0 0 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 2005 2–1 66.7% #366 1,604 0 0 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,628 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,608 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,555 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Janette Husarova Sandra Cecchini
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 1984 12 4 16 75.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1994 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1985 6 7 13 46.2% 15 8 23 65.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
22 1996 4 5 9 44.4% 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1987 8 4 12 66.7% 26 10 36 72.2% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1997 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 29 8 37 78.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
24 1998 2 4 6 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — 1989 1 2 3 33.3% 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1999 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 21 9 30 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2001 6 8 14 42.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 21 11 32 65.6% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
28 2002 17 15 32 53.1% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1993 3 3 6 50.0% 15 10 25 60.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2003 3 9 12 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1994 3 2 5 60.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7%
30 2004 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
31 2005 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 3 3 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — —
Career — 39 53 92 42.4% 30 42 72 41.7% 0 5 5 0.0% 10 9 19 52.6% — 40 42 82 48.8% 236 140 376 62.8% 3 8 11 27.3% 21 26 47 44.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Janette Husarova Sandra Cecchini
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1478 96.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.07
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1484 101.9 — — — — — +37 — 44.4% +0.11 1–0 — — +0.65
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1497 106.6 — — — — — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 — — +0.17
19 1993 1547 100.6 — — — — +34 — — 75.0% +0.38 — 1–0 — +0.39 1984 1651 123.3 — — — — +49 -79 -56 53.9% +0.38 5–7 (42%) 1–3 (25%) 96.6 +2.06
20 1994 1508 103.9 — — — — +39 +46 — 32.6% -1.23 3–2 (60%) 0–3 (0%) 98.6 +1.20 1985 1747 132.3 — — — — -80 +43 — 51.1% -0.19 8–4 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 109.7 +0.71
21 1995 1477 101.2 — — — — +49 — — 23.1% -1.92 0–1 1–0 — -0.05 1986 1633 120.0 — — — — -65 +149 — 43.2% -0.53 4–4 (50%) 0–3 (0%) 96.0 +0.42
22 1996 1545 112.8 — — — — -4 +37 — 51.7% -0.07 2–6 (25%) 2–3 (40%) 96.0 +1.72 1987 1859 148.1 — — — — -141 +79 — 66.7% +1.10 7–6 (54%) 6–2 (75%) 103.4 +0.44
23 1997 1542 102.2 — — — — -3 — — 60.0% +1.00 0–1 — — -0.04 1988 1843 145.8 — — — — -149 +157 — 64.2% +1.10 9–2 (82%) 5–2 (71%) 107.7 +2.46
24 1998 1525 112.1 — — — — +6 +37 — 36.4% -1.00 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 103.2 +0.35 1989 1799 128.9 — — — — -134 +134 — 59.4% +0.59 13–7 (65%) 5–5 (50%) 99.8 +3.27
25 1999 1502 104.4 — — — — — +26 — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.55 1990 1815 140.5 — — — — -136 +130 — 60.0% +0.83 10–5 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 +0.82
26 2000 1490 103.1 — — — — +10 +53 — 42.9% -0.57 2–3 (40%) — — +0.68 1991 1774 131.6 — — — — -138 +151 — 61.3% +0.68 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 100.3 +1.96
27 2001 1527 118.7 — — — — +9 +8 — 42.9% -0.52 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 99.1 +0.95 1992 1824 136.5 — — — — -222 +141 — 55.6% +0.29 8–2 (80%) 4–2 (67%) 107.8 +0.11
28 2002 1717 138.8 — — — — -46 -61 — 53.0% +0.11 10–5 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 107.9 -2.46 1993 1727 129.9 — — — — -151 +131 — 53.9% +0.20 5–5 (50%) 7–1 (88%) 101.3 -0.35
29 2003 1579 119.5 -1.15 -0.24 0.755 43.7% +16 +25 — 37.5% -0.89 3–7 (30%) 1–1 — +0.52 1994 1841 138.9 — — — — -123 +6 — 57.0% +0.51 14–5 (74%) 1–5 (17%) 101.9 +0.57
30 2004 1590 109.9 — — — — — — — 60.0% -0.20 0–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.11 1995 1661 113.4 — — — — +36 +34 — 40.7% -0.54 4–4 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 95.9 +0.31
31 2005 1605 111.1 — — — — +9 — — 100.0% +4.25 — — — +0.07 1996 1629 109.5 — — — — +14 +62 — 52.4% +0.05 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +1.57
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1608 106.4 — — — — — +32 — 39.1% -1.30 0–1 2–0 — -0.39
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1555 95.4 — — — — — +15 — 34.6% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.33
Career — 1737 124.3 -1.15 -0.24 0.755 43.7% -4 +11 — 44.9% -0.45 25–32 (44%) 15–16 (48%) 100.2 +1.54 — 1936 137.9 — — — — -93 +97 -56 55.5% +0.35 98–62 (61%) 42–34 (55%) 106.0 +2.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.