H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Janine Tremelling vs Donna Faber H2H: 0-1

Donna Faber holds a 1–0 lead over Janine Tremelling in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Donna Faber leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Donna Faber won the 1989 Wimbledon round of 64 7-6 4-1 RET.

AUS Age 59 Right-Handed
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Donna Faber #96 7-6 4-1 (ret.) Janine Tremelling #87 Match data Jun 30, 1989* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Janine Tremelling #408 #53 14 1,721 39 59 39.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Donna Faber #227 #55 19 1,718 68 97 41.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Janine Tremelling Donna Faber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1982 1–1 50.0% 1,506 0 0
15 1987 1–2 33.3% #218 1,495 0 0
16 1988 6–9 40.0% #131 1,532 0 0
17 1985 8–15 34.8% 1,575 0 0 1989 19–19 50.0% #59 1,674 0 0
18 1986 13–18 41.9% #67 1,601 0 1 1990 15–18 45.5% #84 1,630 0 0
19 1987 6–7 46.2% #106 1,622 0 1 1991 15–19 44.1% #99 1,593 0 0
20 1988 3–4 42.9% #182 1,606 0 1 1992 11–20 35.5% #116 1,541 0 0
21 1989 6–8 42.9% #116 1,613 0 1 1993 1–10 9.1% #227 1,431 0 0
22 1990 2–6 25.0% #214 1,590 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Janine Tremelling Donna Faber
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1982 1 1 2 50.0%
15 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9%
17 1985 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1989 15 10 25 60.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1986 10 7 17 58.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1990 5 7 12 41.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1988 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 8 12 20 40.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1989 0 3 3 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1993 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1990 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 15 18 33 45.5% 11 15 26 42.3% 12 17 29 41.4% 1 8 9 11.1% 42 53 95 44.2% 19 29 48 39.6% 6 10 16 37.5% 1 5 6 16.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Janine Tremelling Donna Faber
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1982 1506 102.8 50.0% 0.00 1–0 +0.39
15 1987 1496 103.9 33.3% -0.17 +0.11
16 1988 1532 112.2 +4 +14 40.6% -0.63 1–1 1–1 +0.30
17 1985 1576 132.6 +41 +25 39.2% -0.65 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 96.7 -0.42 1989 1675 137.0 +40 -169 -99 48.9% +0.16 7–7 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 100.4 +1.23
18 1986 1601 125.1 +35 -30 -50 45.1% -0.61 3–6 (33%) 6–3 (67%) 101.1 -0.07 1990 1631 115.4 -7 -19 -43 43.1% -0.68 5–1 (83%) 2–1 (67%) +0.90
19 1987 1623 116.9 -61 -16 41.4% -0.83 3–0 (100%) 0–1 -0.26 1991 1593 109.9 -20 +38 +10 41.3% -0.77 9–3 (75%) 4–5 (44%) 106.2 +1.62
20 1988 1607 109.6 -25 -7 47.4% -0.53 2–3 (40%) +0.37 1992 1542 119.9 +26 +37 38.0% -0.77 4–5 (44%) 1–4 (20%) 97.6 +0.56
21 1989 1614 117.3 -73 +43 -27 44.4% -0.26 3–0 (100%) 0–2 -0.05 1993 1432 94.2 +34 20.0% -2.12 0–3 (0%) 3–2 (60%) 97.5 +0.77
22 1990 1591 112.1 +36 30.0% -1.60 2–2 (50%) 1–0 -0.65
Career 1722 128.2 +24 -1 -7 42.1% -0.68 14–15 (48%) 10–9 (53%) 104.0 -0.70 1719 121.4 +14 -11 -44 41.2% -0.60 26–20 (57%) 13–17 (43%) 103.5 +3.33

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.