H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Janine Tremelling vs Hu Na H2H: 0-1

Hu Na holds a 1–0 lead over Janine Tremelling in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hu Na leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Hu Na won the 1986 Oklahoma round of 32 1-6 6-3 6-2.

AUS Age 59 Right-Handed
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 63 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Hu Na 1-6 6-3 6-2 Janine Tremelling #88 Match data Feb 27, 1986* R32 Oklahoma WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Janine Tremelling #408 #53 14 1,721 39 59 39.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Hu Na 1,702 60 94 39.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Janine Tremelling Hu Na
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1982 1–1 50.0% 1,506 0 0
17 1985 8–15 34.8% 1,575 0 0 1980 2–3 40.0% 1,504 0 0
18 1986 13–18 41.9% #67 1,601 0 1 1981 0–1 0.0% 1,497 0 0
19 1987 6–7 46.2% #106 1,622 0 1
20 1988 3–4 42.9% #182 1,606 0 1 1983 1–3 25.0% 1,482 0 0
21 1989 6–8 42.9% #116 1,613 0 1
22 1990 2–6 25.0% #214 1,590 0 1 1985 6–9 40.0% 1,537 0 0
23 1986 11–16 40.7% 1,575 0 0
24 1987 17–18 48.6% 1,654 0 0
25 1988 8–18 30.8% 1,584 0 0
26 1989 8–13 38.1% 1,577 0 0
27 1990 7–12 36.8% 1,560 0 0
28 1991 0–1 0.0% 1,541 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Janine Tremelling Hu Na
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1982 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1985 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1986 10 7 17 58.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1981 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
20 1988 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1989 0 3 3 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1990 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1985 3 4 7 42.9% 3 5 8 37.5%
23 1986 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
24 1987 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 5 8 37.5%
25 1988 7 10 17 41.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1989 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
27 1990 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1991 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 15 18 33 45.5% 11 15 26 42.3% 12 17 29 41.4% 1 8 9 11.1% 29 46 75 38.7% 7 14 21 33.3% 16 22 38 42.1% 7 11 18 38.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Janine Tremelling Hu Na
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1982 1506 102.8 50.0% 0.00 1–0 +0.39
17 1985 1576 132.6 +41 +25 39.2% -0.65 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 96.7 -0.42 1980 1505 99.5 40.0% -1.30 2–0 -0.20
18 1986 1601 125.1 +35 -30 -50 45.1% -0.61 3–6 (33%) 6–3 (67%) 101.1 -0.07 1981 1497 94.9 0.0% -3.00 -0.01
19 1987 1623 116.9 -61 -16 41.4% -0.83 3–0 (100%) 0–1 -0.26
20 1988 1607 109.6 -25 -7 47.4% -0.53 2–3 (40%) +0.37 1983 1482 102.7 +55 25.0% -1.13 +0.33
21 1989 1614 117.3 -73 +43 -27 44.4% -0.26 3–0 (100%) 0–2 -0.05
22 1990 1591 112.1 +36 30.0% -1.60 2–2 (50%) 1–0 -0.65 1985 1537 120.9 +34 +34 43.8% -0.75 0–2 0–2 +0.41
23 1986 1575 112.6 +7 -17 -5 42.2% -0.55 5–5 (50%) 6–2 (75%) 104.9 +2.38
24 1987 1654 129.6 -11 -85 -57 49.4% +0.18 6–7 (46%) 2–6 (25%) 98.9 +0.05
25 1988 1584 122.3 +26 -52 -39 36.7% -0.90 2–6 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 96.3 -0.71
26 1989 1578 119.6 -34 -61 +49 39.6% -0.33 3–3 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.3 +0.32
27 1990 1561 108.7 -57 -60 +88 41.9% -0.47 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 96.9 +0.79
28 1991 1542 98.5 0.0% -2.00 +0.17
Career 1722 128.2 +24 -1 -7 42.1% -0.68 14–15 (48%) 10–9 (53%) 104.0 -0.70 1702 122.7 -1 -57 +13 41.8% -0.47 17–27 (39%) 16–19 (46%) 96.9 +2.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.