H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Janine Tremelling vs Isabel Cueto H2H: 0-1

Isabel Cueto holds a 1–0 lead over Janine Tremelling in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Isabel Cueto leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Isabel Cueto won the 1985 Bregenz round of 32 2-6 6-3 6-4.

AUS Age 59 Right-Handed
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
GER Age 57 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Isabel Cueto 2-6 6-3 6-4 Janine Tremelling Match data Jul 18, 1985* R32 Bregenz WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Janine Tremelling #408 #53 14 1,721 39 59 39.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Isabel Cueto #256 #20 45 1,885 130 101 56.3% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Janine Tremelling Isabel Cueto
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1982 1–1 50.0% 1,506 0 0
15 1984 1–2 33.3% #168 1,509 0 0
16 1985 6–9 40.0% #165 1,520 0 0
17 1985 8–15 34.8% 1,575 0 0 1986 12–16 42.9% #101 1,538 0 0
18 1986 13–18 41.9% #67 1,601 0 1 1987 30–17 63.8% #29 1,761 0 0
19 1987 6–7 46.2% #106 1,622 0 1 1988 27–15 64.3% #31 1,825 0 2
20 1988 3–4 42.9% #182 1,606 0 1 1989 24–12 66.7% #28 1,816 0 4
21 1989 6–8 42.9% #116 1,613 0 1 1990 23–14 62.2% #26 1,799 0 5
22 1990 2–6 25.0% #214 1,590 0 1 1991 7–11 38.9% #117 1,662 0 5
23 1992 0–5 0.0% #283 1,590 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Janine Tremelling Isabel Cueto
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1982 1 1 2 50.0%
15 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
16 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1985 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1986 10 7 17 58.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1987 5 4 9 55.6% 25 12 37 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1988 2 2 4 50.0% 23 11 34 67.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1988 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 1 1 2 50.0% 23 11 34 67.6%
21 1989 0 3 3 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 22 11 33 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1990 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 6 9 15 40.0%
23 1992 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 15 18 33 45.5% 11 15 26 42.3% 12 17 29 41.4% 1 8 9 11.1% 12 21 33 36.4% 116 72 188 61.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Janine Tremelling Isabel Cueto
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1982 1506 102.8 50.0% 0.00 1–0 +0.39
15 1984 1509 106.2 42.9% -1.14 0–1 1–0 -0.12
16 1985 1521 110.4 +17 +59 44.4% -0.39 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 97.3 +1.55
17 1985 1576 132.6 +41 +25 39.2% -0.65 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 96.7 -0.42 1986 1539 121.5 -48 +97 43.8% -0.06 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 99.0 +2.15
18 1986 1601 125.1 +35 -30 -50 45.1% -0.61 3–6 (33%) 6–3 (67%) 101.1 -0.07 1987 1761 135.7 -187 +64 57.5% +0.56 11–1 (92%) 3–5 (38%) 110.5 +3.28
19 1987 1623 116.9 -61 -16 41.4% -0.83 3–0 (100%) 0–1 -0.26 1988 1826 141.4 -254 +103 62.0% +1.03 5–3 (63%) 2–5 (29%) 99.0 +0.40
20 1988 1607 109.6 -25 -7 47.4% -0.53 2–3 (40%) +0.37 1989 1817 132.8 +87 64.6% +1.01 6–3 (67%) 5–6 (45%) 98.8 +1.58
21 1989 1614 117.3 -73 +43 -27 44.4% -0.26 3–0 (100%) 0–2 -0.05 1990 1799 139.4 -220 +80 60.2% +0.75 5–4 (56%) 5–4 (56%) 97.0 -0.94
22 1990 1591 112.1 +36 30.0% -1.60 2–2 (50%) 1–0 -0.65 1991 1662 120.0 -82 +47 45.2% -0.19 3–5 (38%) 0–4 (0%) 91.6 +0.03
23 1992 1591 97.8 -65 0.0% -3.67 -0.24
Career 1722 128.2 +24 -1 -7 42.1% -0.68 14–15 (48%) 10–9 (53%) 104.0 -0.70 1885 137.0 -131 +81 55.3% +0.47 36–25 (59%) 20–30 (40%) 95.9 +3.33

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.