H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Janine Tremelling vs Isabelle Demongeot H2H: 0-1
Isabelle Demongeot holds a 1–0 lead over Janine Tremelling in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Isabelle Demongeot leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Isabelle Demongeot won the 1986 Wimbledon first round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 58
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 59
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 1986* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Isabelle Demongeot | 6-1 6-2 | Janine Tremelling | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janine Tremelling | #408 | #53 | 14 | 1,723 | 39 | 59 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Isabelle Demongeot | #522 | #35 | 69 | 1,850 | 119 | 156 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Janine Tremelling | Isabelle Demongeot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1982 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1985 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1986 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #67 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #135 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #106 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #65 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #182 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #53 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #116 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #45 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #214 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #46 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #78 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #63 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #136 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #150 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #160 | 1,547 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #242 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |