H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Janine Tremelling vs Julie Salmon H2H: 0-1

Julie Salmon holds a 1–0 lead over Janine Tremelling in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Julie Salmon leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Julie Salmon won the 1986 Birmingham round of 64 6-4 6-4.

AUS Age 59 Right-Handed
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Julie Salmon 6-4 6-4 Janine Tremelling #60 Match data Jun 11, 1986* R64 Birmingham WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Janine Tremelling #408 #53 14 1,721 39 59 39.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Julie Salmon 1,552 15 51 22.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Janine Tremelling Julie Salmon
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1982 1–1 50.0% 1,506 0 0
15 1981 1–2 33.3% 1,503 0 0
16 1982 5–3 62.5% 1,522 0 0
17 1985 8–15 34.8% 1,575 0 0 1983 0–5 0.0% 1,476 0 0
18 1986 13–18 41.9% #67 1,601 0 1 1984 2–5 28.6% 1,491 0 0
19 1987 6–7 46.2% #106 1,622 0 1 1985 0–1 0.0% 1,485 0 0
20 1988 3–4 42.9% #182 1,606 0 1 1986 1–3 25.0% 1,472 0 0
21 1989 6–8 42.9% #116 1,613 0 1 1987 2–5 28.6% 1,469 0 0
22 1990 2–6 25.0% #214 1,590 0 1 1988 3–12 20.0% 1,425 0 0
23 1989 0–5 0.0% 1,376 0 0
24 1990 1–6 14.3% 1,363 0 0
25 1991 0–3 0.0% 1,350 0 0
27 1993 0–1 0.0% 1,341 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Janine Tremelling Julie Salmon
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1982 1 1 2 50.0%
15 1981 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1982 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1985 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1983 0 5 5 0.0%
18 1986 10 7 17 58.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
19 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1985 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1988 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1989 0 3 3 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
22 1990 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1988 0 6 6 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 1990 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
27 1993 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 15 18 33 45.5% 11 15 26 42.3% 12 17 29 41.4% 1 8 9 11.1% 1 12 13 7.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 31 39 20.5% 0 3 3 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Janine Tremelling Julie Salmon
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1982 1506 102.8 50.0% 0.00 1–0 +0.39
15 1981 1503 102.3 50.0% 0.00 0–1 -0.10
16 1982 1523 109.4 +47 57.1% +0.86 1–2 (33%) +0.78
17 1985 1576 132.6 +41 +25 39.2% -0.65 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) 96.7 -0.42 1983 1476 94.8 +9 0.0% -3.00 0–1 -0.01
18 1986 1601 125.1 +35 -30 -50 45.1% -0.61 3–6 (33%) 6–3 (67%) 101.1 -0.07 1984 1491 100.7 +30 33.3% -2.13 0–1 2–0 -0.08
19 1987 1623 116.9 -61 -16 41.4% -0.83 3–0 (100%) 0–1 -0.26 1985 1486 97.2 0.0% -3.00 0–1 -0.08
20 1988 1607 109.6 -25 -7 47.4% -0.53 2–3 (40%) +0.37 1986 1473 94.1 -19 25.0% -2.13 0–1 +0.38
21 1989 1614 117.3 -73 +43 -27 44.4% -0.26 3–0 (100%) 0–2 -0.05 1987 1469 99.1 -57 31.3% -1.56 1–1 0–1 +0.42
22 1990 1591 112.1 +36 30.0% -1.60 2–2 (50%) 1–0 -0.65 1988 1425 99.1 +14 +10 25.7% -1.71 2–3 (40%) 1–5 (17%) 96.2 +0.80
23 1989 1377 90.3 +28 0.0% -3.60 +0.48
24 1990 1363 102.1 +23 23.5% -1.71 1–2 (33%) 1–1 +0.20
25 1991 1351 100.6 0.0% -4.00 -0.07
27 1993 1342 97.3 0.0% -3.00 0–1 +0.07
Career 1722 128.2 +24 -1 -7 42.1% -0.68 14–15 (48%) 10–9 (53%) 104.0 -0.70 1553 98.1 +14 +47 +3 25.2% -1.82 4–7 (36%) 5–14 (26%) 92.4 +4.36

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.