H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Jarmila Wolfe vs Aiko Nakamura H2H: 1-0

Jarmila Wolfe holds a 1–0 lead over Aiko Nakamura in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jarmila Wolfe leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jarmila Wolfe won the 2011 Japan Women's Open round of 32 6-0 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jarmila Wolfe
AUS Age 39 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Aiko Nakamura
JPN Age 42 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jarmila Wolfe #30 6-0 6-1 Aiko Nakamura #221 Match data Oct 13, 2011* R32 Japan Women's Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jarmila Wolfe #623 #25 2,060 1,800 104 137 43.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Aiko Nakamura #730 #47 569 1,644 50 76 39.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jarmila Wolfe Aiko Nakamura
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2003 2–1 66.7% #195 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2004 0–1 0.0% #222 1,515 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2005 2–2 50.0% #147 1,537 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2006 8–12 40.0% #69 1,533 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2007 6–14 30.0% #142 1,475 0 0 2004 1–2 33.3% #135 1,505 0 0
21 2008 3–6 33.3% #99 1,504 0 0 2005 11–13 45.8% #71 1,568 0 0
22 2009 9–14 39.1% #110 1,562 0 0 2006 19–18 51.4% #57 1,620 0 0
23 2010 19–12 61.3% #42 1,688 0 1 2007 13–21 38.2% #66 1,548 0 0
24 2011 28–23 54.9% #33 1,697 0 2 2008 5–18 21.7% #146 1,489 0 0
25 2012 7–19 26.9% #183 1,510 0 2 2009 0–2 0.0% #224 1,461 0 0
26 2013 3–3 50.0% #238 1,535 0 2 2010 1–1 50.0% #677 1,475 0 0
27 2014 6–10 37.5% #71 1,553 0 2 2011 0–1 0.0% #231 1,468 0 0
28 2015 11–18 37.9% #105 1,537 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2016 0–2 0.0% #624 1,479 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jarmila Wolfe Aiko Nakamura
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2003 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 2 10 12 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2004 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2008 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 9 10 19 47.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2009 2 8 10 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2006 17 12 29 58.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2010 10 7 17 58.8% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2007 10 15 25 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2011 18 16 34 52.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2008 2 14 16 12.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
25 2012 5 12 17 29.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2013 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2014 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2015 9 11 20 45.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2016 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 65 89 154 42.2% 27 29 56 48.2% 12 18 30 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — 40 56 96 41.7% 4 9 13 30.8% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 3 4 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jarmila Wolfe Aiko Nakamura
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2003 1532 109.1 — — — — — +33 — 66.7% +1.17 — — — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2004 1515 97.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 1538 107.7 — — — — -8 — — 50.0% -0.63 — 1–0 — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 1533 102.2 — — — — 0 +11 +27 40.9% -0.55 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 98.8 +1.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 1475 97.8 — — — — -41 +56 — 35.6% -0.98 1–4 (20%) 0–2 — +0.59 2004 1505 108.0 — — — — +23 — — 33.3% -1.17 — 1–0 — -0.35
21 2008 1505 117.9 — — — — -2 — — 35.0% -1.15 1–1 2–3 (40%) — -0.54 2005 1568 117.9 -3.08 -1.83 0.770 44.8% +2 — — 45.8% -0.30 6–5 (55%) 1–5 (17%) 99.1 +0.24
22 2009 1563 119.3 — — — — -98 +18 +22 43.4% -0.75 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 97.3 -0.65 2006 1621 117.5 -1.07 -2.00 0.920 47.9% +24 -78 — 50.6% -0.13 5–6 (45%) 5–1 (83%) 101.1 +1.14
23 2010 1689 133.8 — — — — -92 -65 -29 61.4% +1.03 3–5 (38%) 3–5 (38%) 98.5 +1.85 2007 1548 108.1 -3.29 -1.84 0.891 47.2% -11 -43 +34 37.3% -0.84 5–4 (56%) 1–6 (14%) 97.1 +0.20
24 2011 1698 138.0 — — — — -35 -1 -32 55.3% +0.24 5–9 (36%) 9–4 (69%) 101.3 -1.13 2008 1489 112.6 -3.75 -4.17 0.729 43.7% -29 +17 +95 22.0% -2.16 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 102.7 -1.31
25 2012 1510 111.2 — — — — +23 +130 — 33.3% -1.22 4–8 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 93.6 +0.36 2009 1461 93.4 -2.15 -0.86 0.675 40.3% — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — +0.24
26 2013 1535 111.3 — — — — +14 — — 50.0% +0.14 1–1 — — +0.26 2010 1475 101.1 -2.97 -1.43 0.680 40.8% — — — 40.0% -2.00 1–0 1–0 — -0.01
27 2014 1554 120.0 +0.80 -1.14 0.972 49.3% +14 — — 47.4% -0.03 2–6 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +0.49 2011 1469 95.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.13
28 2015 1537 122.3 +0.24 -2.00 0.920 48.3% +41 +43 +60 44.1% -0.62 4–8 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 96.9 -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2016 1480 93.6 -1.39 +0.21 0.729 43.2% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1801 126.0 +0.36 -1.59 0.927 48.4% -18 +22 +9 46.4% -0.29 25–50 (33%) 27–30 (47%) 92.4 +0.91 — 1644 115.0 -2.87 -2.40 0.829 45.9% +1 -43 +65 39.6% -0.84 20–19 (51%) 11–13 (46%) 101.2 +0.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.