H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jarmila Wolfe vs Alicia Molik H2H: 0-1
Alicia Molik holds a 1–0 lead over Jarmila Wolfe in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alicia Molik leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Alicia Molik won the 2003 Budapest quarterfinal 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2003* | Budapest | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Alicia Molik | 6-4 6-3 | Jarmila Wolfe | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jarmila Wolfe | #623 | #25 | 2,060 | 1,799 | 104 | 137 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Alicia Molik | #403 | #8 | 2,630 | 2,035 | 151 | 161 | 48.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jarmila Wolfe | Alicia Molik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2003 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #195 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #147 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #96 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #142 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #47 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #94 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #110 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #36 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2010 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #42 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #13 | 1,938 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2011 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #28 | 1,779 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2012 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #183 | 1,509 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #165 | 1,632 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2013 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #238 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #56 | 1,628 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2014 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #71 | 1,555 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #308 | 1,577 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2015 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #105 | 1,537 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #624 | 1,480 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,561 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,584 | 0 | 5 |