H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Jarmila Wolfe vs Alicia Molik H2H: 0-1

Alicia Molik holds a 1–0 lead over Jarmila Wolfe in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alicia Molik leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Alicia Molik won the 2003 Budapest quarterfinal 6-4 6-3.

Australia Age 39 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
AUS Age 45 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Alicia Molik #54 6-4 6-3 Jarmila Wolfe #472 Match data Apr 19, 2003* QF Budapest Tier V modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jarmila Wolfe #623 #25 2,060 1,800 104 137 43.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Alicia Molik #403 #8 2,630 2,060 156 164 48.8% 0 1 0 1 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jarmila Wolfe Alicia Molik
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2003 2–1 66.7% #195 1,532 0 0
17 2004 0–1 0.0% #222 1,515 0 0
18 2005 2–2 50.0% #147 1,537 0 0 1999 7–12 36.8% #96 1,537 0 0
19 2006 8–12 40.0% #69 1,533 0 0 2000 6–11 35.3% #115 1,544 0 0
20 2007 6–14 30.0% #142 1,475 0 0 2001 14–17 45.2% #47 1,613 0 0
21 2008 3–6 33.3% #99 1,504 0 0 2002 10–19 34.5% #94 1,568 0 0
22 2009 9–14 39.1% #110 1,562 0 0 2003 25–16 61.0% #36 1,705 0 1
23 2010 19–12 61.3% #42 1,688 0 1 2004 42–19 68.9% #13 1,977 0 4
24 2011 28–23 54.9% #33 1,697 0 2 2005 17–14 54.8% #28 1,796 0 5
25 2012 7–19 26.9% #183 1,510 0 2 2006 6–14 30.0% #165 1,640 0 5
26 2013 3–3 50.0% #238 1,535 0 2 2007 18–22 45.0% #56 1,636 0 5
27 2014 6–10 37.5% #71 1,553 0 2 2008 1–6 14.3% #308 1,567 0 5
28 2015 11–18 37.9% #105 1,537 0 2
29 2016 0–2 0.0% #624 1,479 0 2 2010 8–12 40.0% #129 1,557 0 5
30 2011 2–2 50.0% #349 1,582 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jarmila Wolfe Alicia Molik
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2003 2 1 3 66.7%
17 2004 0 1 1 0.0%
18 2005 2 2 4 50.0% 1999 4 8 12 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 2006 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2000 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2007 2 10 12 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 9 12 21 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
21 2008 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 7 12 19 36.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2009 2 8 10 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2003 15 10 25 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 2010 10 7 17 58.8% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 2004 32 10 42 76.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2011 18 16 34 52.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2005 17 11 28 60.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2012 5 12 17 29.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 3 9 12 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2013 3 3 6 50.0% 2007 15 15 30 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 2014 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
28 2015 9 11 20 45.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
29 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 2010 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 2011 2 2 4 50.0%
Career 65 89 154 42.2% 27 29 56 48.2% 12 18 30 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 115 106 221 52.0% 24 33 57 42.1% 17 22 39 43.6% 0 3 3 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 42/47 of Jarmila Wolfe's and 89/224 of Alicia Molik's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jarmila Wolfe Alicia Molik
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 —/— 2003 7/41 6.3 3.9 53.4% 74.6% 47.7% 72.3% 36.5% 62.3% 37.6%
23 —/— 2004 7/61 5.3 1.9 58.4% 68.2% 56.2% 50.7% 54.6% 63.4% 45.6%
24 —/— 2005 8/31 7.3 2.8 60.1% 72.0% 49.5% 63.8% 34.9% 63.1% 37.2%
25 —/— 2006 9/20 5.2 2.7 60.9% 56.7% 43.2% 48.0% 27.4% 51.0% 35.2%
26 —/— 2007 30/40 6.1 2.7 63.5% 66.5% 44.5% 56.3% 41.8% 58.7% 36.5%
27 2014 15/16 5.6 3.9 58.1% 67.2% 45.9% 47.1% 47.4% 57.9% 40.9% 2008 6/7 5.3 3.2 56.4% 63.3% 43.4% 57.3% 69.5% 54.6% 35.1%
28 2015 25/29 4.2 3.7 59.2% 65.8% 47.6% 45.6% 40.9% 58.3% 38.4% —/—
29 2016 2/2 6.0 5.5 58.3% 61.4% 31.9% 50.0% 29.2% 49.2% 37.1% 2010 18/20 4.0 3.7 60.6% 60.4% 45.8% 56.5% 51.9% 54.8% 39.6%
30 —/— 2011 4/4 2.3 2.5 58.7% 56.1% 45.4% 40.6% 43.1% 51.6% 35.1%
Career 42/241 4.8 3.9 58.8% 66.1% 46.3% 46.4% 42.7% 57.7% 39.2% 89/320 5.4 2.9 60.5% 64.9% 46.2% 56.3% 44.3% 57.6% 37.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jarmila Wolfe Alicia Molik
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2003 1532 109.1 +33 66.7% +1.17 -0.09
17 2004 1515 97.3 0.0% -2.50 +0.08
18 2005 1538 107.7 -8 50.0% -0.63 1–0 +0.03 1999 1538 124.1 +1 +32 +39 40.0% -0.67 3–4 (43%) -0.37
19 2006 1533 102.2 0 +11 +27 40.9% -0.55 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 98.8 +1.14 2000 1545 115.2 +14 -19 +28 40.5% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) 97.1 -0.44
20 2007 1475 97.8 -41 +56 35.6% -0.98 1–4 (20%) 0–2 +0.59 2001 1614 121.4 -29 -100 +81 50.0% -0.26 5–7 (42%) 8–4 (67%) 106.1 +0.43
21 2008 1505 117.9 -2 35.0% -1.15 1–1 2–3 (40%) -0.54 2002 1569 124.5 -14 -45 40.9% -0.48 1–7 (13%) 3–3 (50%) 93.3 -1.20
22 2009 1563 119.3 -98 +18 +22 43.4% -0.75 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 97.3 -0.65 2003 1706 136.1 +3.00 -2.49 0.999 50.8% -34 -56 -42 59.1% +0.82 8–4 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 105.1 -0.67
23 2010 1689 133.8 -92 -65 -29 61.4% +1.03 3–5 (38%) 3–5 (38%) 98.5 +1.85 2004 1978 154.9 +4.02 +1.09 1.244 53.8% -4 -279 -302 66.4% +1.05 9–9 (50%) 8–6 (57%) 104.1 -3.21
24 2011 1698 138.0 -35 -1 -32 55.3% +0.24 5–9 (36%) 9–4 (69%) 101.3 -1.13 2005 1796 147.3 +4.13 -2.25 1.007 50.9% +36 55.9% +0.43 4–4 (50%) 7–4 (64%) 98.0 -0.03
25 2012 1510 111.2 +23 +130 33.3% -1.22 4–8 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 93.6 +0.36 2006 1641 108.0 -1.66 -3.77 0.719 43.4% +48 +8 -24 33.3% -1.29 2–3 (40%) 3–6 (33%) 94.8 -0.84
26 2013 1535 111.3 +14 50.0% +0.14 1–1 +0.26 2007 1636 131.0 +2.14 -5.78 0.884 47.8% +52 -31 -15 45.5% -0.23 6–6 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 99.9 -1.11
27 2014 1554 120.0 +0.80 -1.14 0.972 49.3% +14 47.4% -0.03 2–6 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +0.49 2008 1568 101.1 -1.44 -2.86 0.773 45.3% +84 -29 14.3% -2.36 1–2 (33%) -0.12
28 2015 1537 122.3 +0.24 -2.00 0.920 48.3% +41 +43 +60 44.1% -0.62 4–8 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 96.9 -0.27
29 2016 1480 93.6 -1.39 +0.21 0.729 43.2% 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 +0.07 2010 1557 118.1 -1.04 -3.67 0.876 47.8% +57 +39 41.7% -0.54 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 96.8 +0.44
30 2011 1582 106.7 -1.46 -2.46 0.726 43.7% +48 44.4% -1.44 1–0 -0.33
Career 1801 126.0 +0.36 -1.59 0.927 48.4% -18 +22 +9 46.4% -0.29 25–50 (33%) 27–30 (47%) 92.4 +0.91 2061 138.9 +1.10 -3.69 0.889 48.0% +13 -83 -42 49.9% -0.02 46–53 (46%) 40–40 (50%) 99.4 -2.34

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.