H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Jarmila Wolfe vs Anabel Medina Garrigues H2H: 2-0

Jarmila Wolfe holds a 2–0 lead over Anabel Medina Garrigues in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jarmila Wolfe leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jarmila Wolfe won the 2011 Beijing second round 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jarmila Wolfe
AUS Age 39 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Anabel Medina Garrigues
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 5, 2011* Beijing WTA 1000 R64 Hard Jarmila Wolfe #34 6-3 6-0 Anabel Medina Garrigues #29 Match data
May 25, 2011* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Jarmila Wolfe #26 7-6(4) 6-4 Anabel Medina Garrigues #43 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jarmila Wolfe #623 #25 2,060 1,799 104 137 43.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,852 310 275 53.0% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jarmila Wolfe Anabel Medina Garrigues
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2003 2–1 66.7% #195 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2004 0–1 0.0% #222 1,515 0 0 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,494 0 0
18 2005 2–2 50.0% #147 1,538 0 0 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,563 0 1
19 2006 8–12 40.0% #69 1,533 0 0 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1
20 2007 6–14 30.0% #142 1,475 0 0 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1
21 2008 3–6 33.3% #99 1,505 0 0 2004 25–22 53.2% #39 1,716 0 2
22 2009 9–14 39.1% #110 1,562 0 0 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,747 0 4
23 2010 19–12 61.3% #42 1,687 0 1 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,690 0 6
24 2011 28–23 54.9% #33 1,696 0 2 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,694 0 7
25 2012 7–19 26.9% #183 1,509 0 2 2008 41–24 63.1% #22 1,833 0 8
26 2013 3–3 50.0% #238 1,535 0 2 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9
27 2014 6–10 37.5% #71 1,555 0 2 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,565 0 9
28 2015 11–18 37.9% #105 1,537 0 2 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,774 0 11
29 2016 0–2 0.0% #624 1,480 0 2 2012 23–25 47.9% #50 1,629 0 11
30 — — — — — — — 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,553 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,501 0 11