H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jarmila Wolfe vs Mariana Duque-Mariño H2H: 1-0
Jarmila Wolfe holds a 1–0 lead over Mariana Duque-Mariño in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jarmila Wolfe leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jarmila Wolfe won the 2009 Roland Garros second round 6-2 7-6(9).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
COL
Age 36
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2009* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Jarmila Wolfe | 6-2 7-6(9) | Mariana Duque-Mariño | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jarmila Wolfe | #623 | #25 | 2,060 | 1,799 | 104 | 137 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Mariana Duque-Mariño | #709 | #66 | 923 | 1,657 | 48 | 82 | 36.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jarmila Wolfe | Mariana Duque-Mariño | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2003 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #195 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #201 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #147 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #109 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #192 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #142 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #126 | 1,453 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,439 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2009 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #110 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #145 | 1,492 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2010 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #42 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #103 | 1,483 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2011 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #131 | 1,454 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2012 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #183 | 1,509 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #78 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2013 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #238 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #110 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2014 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #71 | 1,555 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #107 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2015 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #105 | 1,537 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #110 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #624 | 1,480 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |