H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Jarmila Wolfe vs Nicole Pratt H2H: 0-1

Nicole Pratt holds a 1–0 lead over Jarmila Wolfe in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicole Pratt leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nicole Pratt won the 2006 Wimbledon first round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jarmila Wolfe
AUS Age 39 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Nicole Pratt
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicole Pratt #136 6-2 6-3 Jarmila Wolfe #86 Match data Jun 28, 2006* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jarmila Wolfe #623 #25 2,060 1,800 104 137 43.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Nicole Pratt #1,043 #35 924 1,764 159 219 42.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jarmila Wolfe Nicole Pratt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2003 2–1 66.7% #195 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2004 0–1 0.0% #222 1,515 0 0 1990 1–1 50.0% #201 1,497 0 0
18 2005 2–2 50.0% #147 1,537 0 0 1991 1–7 12.5% #201 1,469 0 0
19 2006 8–12 40.0% #69 1,533 0 0 1992 3–3 50.0% #203 1,491 0 0
20 2007 6–14 30.0% #142 1,475 0 0 1993 2–5 28.6% #172 1,486 0 0
21 2008 3–6 33.3% #99 1,504 0 0 1994 2–5 28.6% #224 1,465 0 0
22 2009 9–14 39.1% #110 1,562 0 0 1995 0–2 0.0% #214 1,451 0 0
23 2010 19–12 61.3% #42 1,688 0 1 1996 0–2 0.0% #194 1,433 0 0
24 2011 28–23 54.9% #33 1,697 0 2 1997 5–4 55.6% #110 1,494 0 0
25 2012 7–19 26.9% #183 1,510 0 2 1998 4–13 23.5% #113 1,464 0 0
26 2013 3–3 50.0% #238 1,535 0 2 1999 15–17 46.9% #56 1,598 0 0
27 2014 6–10 37.5% #71 1,553 0 2 2000 17–24 41.5% #54 1,630 0 0
28 2015 11–18 37.9% #105 1,537 0 2 2001 22–23 48.9% #51 1,706 0 0
29 2016 0–2 0.0% #624 1,479 0 2 2002 23–20 53.5% #48 1,719 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2003 17–23 42.5% #53 1,646 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2004 21–22 48.8% #50 1,627 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2005 8–17 32.0% #126 1,552 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2006 8–12 40.0% #77 1,528 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2007 10–16 38.5% #70 1,559 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2008 0–3 0.0% #1043 1,538 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jarmila Wolfe Nicole Pratt
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2003 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2006 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1992 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 2 10 12 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1993 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2008 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1994 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 2009 2 8 10 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2010 10 7 17 58.8% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2011 18 16 34 52.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1997 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 2012 5 12 17 29.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2013 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 11 11 22 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2014 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2000 6 13 19 31.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 2015 9 11 20 45.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2001 17 14 31 54.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2016 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 15 13 28 53.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 16 14 30 53.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 17 16 33 51.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 4 8 12 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 6 8 14 42.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 65 89 154 42.2% 27 29 56 48.2% 12 18 30 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — 113 141 254 44.5% 24 43 67 35.8% 18 25 43 41.9% 4 10 14 28.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jarmila Wolfe Nicole Pratt
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2003 1532 109.1 — — — — — +33 — 66.7% +1.17 — — — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2004 1515 97.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.08 1990 1497 96.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.59
18 2005 1538 107.7 — — — — -8 — — 50.0% -0.63 — 1–0 — +0.03 1991 1469 104.6 — — — — +37 — — 17.6% -2.71 0–1 — — -0.50
19 2006 1533 102.2 — — — — 0 +11 +27 40.9% -0.55 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 98.8 +1.14 1992 1492 108.8 — — — — +29 — — 50.0% +0.83 — 0–1 — +0.66
20 2007 1475 97.8 — — — — -41 +56 — 35.6% -0.98 1–4 (20%) 0–2 — +0.59 1993 1487 109.4 — — — — +23 — — 33.3% -1.53 0–1 — — -0.35
21 2008 1505 117.9 — — — — -2 — — 35.0% -1.15 1–1 2–3 (40%) — -0.54 1994 1465 92.2 — — — — +13 — — 31.3% -2.06 1–1 1–0 — +0.51
22 2009 1563 119.3 — — — — -98 +18 +22 43.4% -0.75 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 97.3 -0.65 1995 1452 97.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.06
23 2010 1689 133.8 — — — — -92 -65 -29 61.4% +1.03 3–5 (38%) 3–5 (38%) 98.5 +1.85 1996 1434 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01
24 2011 1698 138.0 — — — — -35 -1 -32 55.3% +0.24 5–9 (36%) 9–4 (69%) 101.3 -1.13 1997 1495 107.7 — — — — +15 — — 52.4% +0.09 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.88
25 2012 1510 111.2 — — — — +23 +130 — 33.3% -1.22 4–8 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 93.6 +0.36 1998 1465 116.3 — — — — +15 +68 — 32.5% -0.78 1–5 (17%) 0–2 — +0.10
26 2013 1535 111.3 — — — — +14 — — 50.0% +0.14 1–1 — — +0.26 1999 1598 112.5 — — — — -23 -75 -40 47.0% -0.68 3–3 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 103.5 +0.11
27 2014 1554 120.0 +0.80 -1.14 0.972 49.3% +14 — — 47.4% -0.03 2–6 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +0.49 2000 1631 127.0 — — — — -52 -72 -60 40.9% -0.62 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.6 -0.98
28 2015 1537 122.3 +0.24 -2.00 0.920 48.3% +41 +43 +60 44.1% -0.62 4–8 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 96.9 -0.27 2001 1707 140.8 — — — — -13 -131 -117 49.5% +0.03 7–6 (54%) 1–6 (14%) 98.7 -1.74
29 2016 1480 93.6 -1.39 +0.21 0.729 43.2% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — +0.07 2002 1720 135.5 — — — — -9 -112 -58 51.0% +0.14 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 106.8 -0.86
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1647 126.9 -0.42 +0.77 0.964 49.1% +47 -102 -73 43.4% -0.35 10–9 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 100.0 -0.96
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1628 117.6 -0.23 -0.93 0.907 47.8% +15 -55 — 46.9% -0.65 10–4 (71%) 9–4 (69%) 108.4 -0.14
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1553 107.5 +0.05 +0.38 1.046 50.5% +30 -50 -13 30.2% -1.49 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — -0.66
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1528 101.2 -2.17 -1.75 0.815 45.5% -18 — +66 39.1% -1.13 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.6 +0.71
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1560 121.7 -1.99 -1.97 0.875 47.0% +13 -85 — 40.6% -0.80 6–6 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 104.7 -0.64
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1538 105.2 -1.42 -0.19 0.647 40.0% +9 — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.45
Career — 1801 126.0 +0.36 -1.59 0.927 48.4% -18 +22 +9 46.4% -0.29 25–50 (33%) 27–30 (47%) 92.4 +0.91 — 1764 126.0 -1.39 -1.16 0.877 47.0% +3 -77 -46 42.3% -0.63 59–52 (53%) 33–28 (54%) 105.5 -0.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.