H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Jarmila Wolfe vs Romina Oprandi H2H: 1-0
Jarmila Wolfe holds a 1–0 lead over Romina Oprandi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jarmila Wolfe leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jarmila Wolfe won the 2013 Hobart third round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 40
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2013* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Jarmila Wolfe | 6-4 7-5 | Romina Oprandi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jarmila Wolfe | #623 | #25 | 2,060 | 1,799 | 104 | 137 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Romina Oprandi | #895 | #32 | 1,490 | 1,694 | 54 | 88 | 38.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jarmila Wolfe | Romina Oprandi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2003 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #195 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #147 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #142 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #256 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #110 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2010 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #42 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #215 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #66 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #183 | 1,509 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #82 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #238 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #61 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2014 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #71 | 1,555 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #78 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2015 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #105 | 1,537 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #114 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #624 | 1,480 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #397 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |