H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jarmila Wolfe vs Sheng-Nan Sun H2H: 1-0
Jarmila Wolfe holds a 1–0 lead over Sheng-Nan Sun in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jarmila Wolfe leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jarmila Wolfe won the 2011 Kuala Lumpur third round 7-6(2) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2011* | Kuala Lumpur | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Jarmila Wolfe | 7-6(2) 6-3 | Sheng-Nan Sun | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jarmila Wolfe | #623 | #25 | 2,060 | 1,799 | 104 | 137 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Sheng-Nan Sun | #909 | #216 | 260 | 1,500 | 0 | 10 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jarmila Wolfe | Sheng-Nan Sun | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #195 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #147 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #348 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,416 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #142 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #353 | 1,400 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #110 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #42 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #183 | 1,509 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #238 | 1,535 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #71 | 1,555 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #105 | 1,537 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #624 | 1,480 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |