H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Jeanne Evert vs Joanne Russell H2H: 2-0

Jeanne Evert holds a 2–0 lead over Joanne Russell in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jeanne Evert leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jeanne Evert won the 1976 Dallas round of 32 1-6 6-4 7-5.

USA 155 cm / 5'1"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jeanne Evert 1-6 6-4 7-5 Joanne Russell Match data Mar 18, 1976* R32 Dallas WTA 250 Carpet
Jeanne Evert 6-4 6-1 Joanne Russell Match data Jul 13, 1974* QF Raleigh WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jeanne Evert — — — 1,884 120 90 57.1% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Joanne Russell — — — 1,938 205 200 50.6% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jeanne Evert Joanne Russell
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1971 7–3 70.0% — 1,602 0 0 — — — — — — —
14 1972 16–9 64.0% — 1,727 0 1 — — — — — — —
15 1973 19–11 63.3% — 1,804 0 3 — — — — — — —
16 1974 17–11 60.7% — 1,849 0 4 — — — — — — —
17 1975 31–19 62.0% — 1,811 0 7 — — — — — — —
18 1976 9–12 42.9% — 1,732 0 7 1973 3–2 60.0% — 1,544 0 0
19 1977 13–12 52.0% — 1,750 0 7 1974 5–2 71.4% — 1,579 0 1
20 1978 8–13 38.1% — 1,635 0 7 1975 17–12 58.6% — 1,691 0 2
21 — — — — — — — 1976 16–14 53.3% — 1,818 0 2
22 — — — — — — — 1977 19–16 54.3% — 1,881 0 2
23 — — — — — — — 1978 13–16 44.8% — 1,860 0 2
24 — — — — — — — 1979 6–10 37.5% — 1,778 0 3
25 — — — — — — — 1980 32–23 58.2% — 1,876 0 3
26 — — — — — — — 1981 27–23 54.0% — 1,808 0 3
27 — — — — — — — 1982 20–22 47.6% — 1,826 0 3
28 — — — — — — — 1983 11–11 50.0% — 1,800 0 3
29 — — — — — — — 1984 27–17 61.4% — 1,839 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 1985 7–20 25.9% — 1,613 0 5
31 — — — — — — — 1986 2–10 16.7% — 1,535 0 5
32 — — — — — — — 1987 0–2 0.0% — 1,515 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jeanne Evert Joanne Russell
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1971 — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1972 — — — — 14 6 20 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1973 1 1 2 50.0% 16 9 25 64.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1974 — — — — 14 7 21 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1975 3 6 9 33.3% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1976 1 2 3 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1973 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1977 3 3 6 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1974 — — — — 5 1 6 83.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1978 4 7 11 36.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1975 2 3 5 40.0% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 6 12 50.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 6 4 10 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 10 17 41.2%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 10 7 17 58.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 14 10 24 58.3%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 3 3 6 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 12 10 22 54.5%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 13 12 25 52.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 3 2 5 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 14 4 18 77.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 3 8 11 27.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 6 7 14.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 12 19 31 38.7% 72 45 117 61.5% 10 12 22 45.5% 2 10 12 16.7% — 45 43 88 51.1% 50 48 98 51.0% 22 25 47 46.8% 70 76 146 47.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jeanne Evert Joanne Russell
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1971 1602 121.0 — — — — — +40 — 65.2% +0.74 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +1.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1972 1727 133.7 — — — — — +67 -174 64.0% +1.06 2–4 (33%) 1–1 — +1.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1973 1805 141.9 — — — — — +18 -198 62.1% +1.11 5–3 (63%) 4–0 (100%) 102.4 -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1974 1849 147.0 — — — — — +53 -213 59.3% +0.69 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 100.1 -3.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1975 1812 131.2 — — — — -202 +24 — 56.1% +0.34 12–6 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 106.1 +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1976 1733 119.2 — — — — -126 +25 -92 45.8% -0.54 2–4 (33%) 1–1 — -0.32 1973 1544 116.2 — — — — — — — 58.3% +0.92 1–1 0–1 — -0.41
19 1977 1751 122.0 — — — — -139 +21 -103 49.1% -0.46 5–2 (71%) 2–2 (50%) 103.8 -0.52 1974 1580 104.9 — — — — — +12 — 62.5% +0.50 2–0 2–1 (67%) — +1.22
20 1978 1635 99.7 — — — — -75 +99 — 35.4% -1.12 5–1 (83%) 2–3 (40%) 103.5 +1.75 1975 1691 132.4 — — — — -81 -39 — 58.0% +0.36 5–6 (45%) 8–3 (73%) 106.8 -1.58
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1818 140.3 — — — — -130 -145 -154 49.2% +0.11 5–2 (71%) 2–2 (50%) 106.2 -1.98
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1881 149.7 — — — — -96 -102 -216 53.8% +0.50 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.8 -3.42
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1861 148.0 — — — — -127 -34 -152 46.4% -0.07 5–6 (45%) 1–4 (20%) 97.5 -3.83
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1778 131.4 — — — — -83 +73 -118 41.9% -0.71 2–1 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 101.9 -2.25
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1876 145.0 — — — — -44 -42 -190 50.8% +0.14 16–2 (89%) 4–4 (50%) 113.6 -3.45
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1809 138.7 — — — — +28 +23 -109 51.3% -0.02 13–8 (62%) 5–4 (56%) 103.6 -1.54
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1826 142.1 — — — — +50 -82 -42 44.9% -0.29 10–8 (56%) 3–4 (43%) 98.5 -1.95
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1800 134.4 — — — — +57 -16 — 49.0% -0.25 4–3 (57%) 4–3 (57%) 101.8 -2.16
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1840 128.5 — — — — +82 -129 -109 57.8% +0.28 9–5 (64%) 9–3 (75%) 105.8 +2.95
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1614 112.1 — — — — +50 +14 +71 26.3% -1.05 2–1 (67%) 0–6 (0%) 95.4 +0.10
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1535 105.7 — — — — +63 +35 — 30.0% -1.47 1–5 (17%) 2–1 (67%) 95.4 -0.27
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1515 97.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.19
Career — 1884 136.0 — — — — -133 +41 -158 54.6% +0.25 35–23 (60%) 16–10 (62%) 107.6 -0.26 — 1939 143.7 — — — — -12 -35 -120 48.9% -0.06 79–52 (60%) 45–42 (52%) 108.6 -4.55

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.