H2H data updated: 2026-10-31 00:00 UTC

Jeanne Evert vs Mareen Louie Harper H2H: 1-0

Jeanne Evert holds a 1–0 lead over Mareen Louie Harper in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jeanne Evert leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jeanne Evert won the 1978 Indianapolis round of 16 7-5 6-2.

USA 155 cm / 5'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jeanne Evert 7-5 6-2 Mareen Louie Harper Match data Aug 11, 1978* R16 Indianapolis WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jeanne Evert — — — 1,884 120 90 57.1% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Mareen Louie Harper — — — 1,911 179 240 42.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jeanne Evert Mareen Louie Harper
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1971 7–3 70.0% — 1,602 0 0 1974 2–1 66.7% — 1,523 0 0
14 1972 16–9 64.0% — 1,727 0 1 — — — — — — —
15 1973 19–11 63.3% — 1,804 0 3 1976 1–2 33.3% — 1,521 0 0
16 1974 17–11 60.7% — 1,849 0 4 1977 0–2 0.0% — 1,519 0 0
17 1975 31–19 62.0% — 1,811 0 7 1978 9–13 40.9% — 1,599 0 0
18 1976 9–12 42.9% — 1,732 0 7 1979 4–13 23.5% — 1,575 0 0
19 1977 13–12 52.0% — 1,750 0 7 1980 22–23 48.9% — 1,719 0 0
20 1978 8–13 38.1% — 1,635 0 7 1981 16–20 44.4% — 1,745 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1982 9–18 33.3% — 1,656 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1983 7–10 41.2% — 1,672 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 1984 18–17 51.4% — 1,734 0 1
24 — — — — — — — 1985 29–18 61.7% — 1,777 0 2
25 — — — — — — — 1986 12–17 41.4% — 1,680 0 2
26 — — — — — — — 1987 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 2
27 — — — — — — — 1988 12–17 41.4% — 1,613 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 1989 6–14 30.0% — 1,576 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 1990 10–15 40.0% — 1,590 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1991 12–16 42.9% — 1,614 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 1992 1–7 12.5% — 1,545 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% — 1,537 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jeanne Evert Mareen Louie Harper
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1971 — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — 1974 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1972 — — — — 14 6 20 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1973 1 1 2 50.0% 16 9 25 64.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
16 1974 — — — — 14 7 21 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1975 3 6 9 33.3% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1978 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0%
18 1976 1 2 3 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1979 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
19 1977 3 3 6 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1980 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 11 18 38.9%
20 1978 4 7 11 36.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1981 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 10 19 47.4%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 4 6 10 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 9 12 25.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2 5 7 28.6%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 14 9 23 60.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 18 9 27 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 8 11 19 42.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 9 11 20 45.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 12 19 31 38.7% 72 45 117 61.5% 10 12 22 45.5% 2 10 12 16.7% — 106 119 225 47.1% 10 16 26 38.5% 16 27 43 37.2% 47 78 125 37.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jeanne Evert Mareen Louie Harper
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1971 1602 121.0 — — — — — +40 — 65.2% +0.74 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +1.14 1974 1524 102.4 — — — — +72 — — 57.1% +0.29 1–0 1–0 — +0.56
14 1972 1727 133.7 — — — — — +67 -174 64.0% +1.06 2–4 (33%) 1–1 — +1.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1973 1805 141.9 — — — — — +18 -198 62.1% +1.11 5–3 (63%) 4–0 (100%) 102.4 -0.17 1976 1522 100.6 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 — — +0.37
16 1974 1849 147.0 — — — — — +53 -213 59.3% +0.69 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 100.1 -3.66 1977 1520 116.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.35
17 1975 1812 131.2 — — — — -202 +24 — 56.1% +0.34 12–6 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 106.1 +0.17 1978 1599 122.7 — — — — +32 -41 — 39.2% -0.96 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 107.4 +0.50
18 1976 1733 119.2 — — — — -126 +25 -92 45.8% -0.54 2–4 (33%) 1–1 — -0.32 1979 1576 121.8 — — — — +27 — — 30.0% -1.90 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.40
19 1977 1751 122.0 — — — — -139 +21 -103 49.1% -0.46 5–2 (71%) 2–2 (50%) 103.8 -0.52 1980 1719 129.4 — — — — -38 -158 -41 46.2% -0.59 12–4 (75%) 2–6 (25%) 107.4 +1.11
20 1978 1635 99.7 — — — — -75 +99 — 35.4% -1.12 5–1 (83%) 2–3 (40%) 103.5 +1.75 1981 1746 134.8 — — — — -2 — -75 42.7% -0.51 7–5 (58%) 4–2 (67%) 104.9 -1.67
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1656 125.3 — — — — -25 -46 — 35.5% -1.06 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -1.44
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1672 132.3 — — — — -12 — — 42.9% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.3 -0.96
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1734 127.7 — — — — +24 — -95 48.8% -0.05 7–3 (70%) 2–3 (40%) 105.0 +0.48
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1778 143.9 — — — — +52 — -156 58.5% +0.41 8–4 (67%) 5–5 (50%) 101.8 -0.23
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1680 121.3 — — — — +20 — -64 39.1% -0.55 5–3 (63%) 2–5 (29%) 97.5 +1.36
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1624 119.6 — — — — +7 — -16 38.6% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — +0.21
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1614 129.2 — — — — +12 — — 43.3% -0.43 4–5 (44%) 5–4 (56%) 100.4 -0.37
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1577 117.4 — — — — -17 — -22 32.0% -1.38 6–4 (60%) 6–1 (86%) 107.4 -1.28
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1591 128.5 — — — — +9 — — 45.8% -0.14 2–7 (22%) 1–3 (25%) 94.5 +0.31
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1615 127.2 — — — — -4 — -50 39.4% -0.53 8–4 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 105.2 +0.46
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1545 105.5 — — — — -7 — — 25.0% -1.81 0–2 1–0 — -0.11
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1537 103.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.17
Career — 1884 136.0 — — — — -133 +41 -158 54.6% +0.25 35–23 (60%) 16–10 (62%) 107.6 -0.26 — 1911 135.4 — — — — +8 -84 -60 42.6% -0.56 76–57 (57%) 41–42 (49%) 107.5 -0.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.