H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jelena Dokic vs Amy Frazier H2H: 2-1
Jelena Dokic holds a 2–1 lead over Amy Frazier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Jelena Dokic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 2004 Amelia Island second round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 53
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2004* | Amelia Island | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Amy Frazier | 6-4 7-5 | Jelena Dokic | Match data |
| Jul 25, 2002* | Stanford | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Jelena Dokic | 6-3 7-5 | Amy Frazier | Match data |
| Apr 21, 2000* | Hilton Head | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Jelena Dokic | 6-2 6-2 | Amy Frazier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Dokic | #945 | #4 | 3,338 | 2,031 | 208 | 175 | 54.3% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Amy Frazier | #450 | #13 | 1,381 | 1,959 | 416 | 307 | 57.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jelena Dokic | Amy Frazier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #147 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #58 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1999 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #43 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #33 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #16 | 1,893 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 2001 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #8 | 1,999 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #28 | 1,813 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 2002 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #19 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 2003 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #15 | 1,778 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #39 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2004 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #124 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #16 | 1,903 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 2005 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #349 | 1,525 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #18 | 1,877 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,499 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,835 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,818 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2008 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #42 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #56 | 1,527 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #19 | 1,876 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #138 | 1,513 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #20 | 1,852 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2011 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,695 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #258 | 1,516 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #39 | 1,757 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #61 | 1,746 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #26 | 1,828 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,730 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #130 | 1,626 | 0 | 8 |