H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jelena Dokic vs Anna Smashnova H2H: 3-1
Jelena Dokic holds a 3–1 lead over Anna Smashnova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jelena Dokic leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jelena Dokic won the 2002 Rome third round 6-3 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 50
Right-Handed
157 cm / 5'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2002* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Jelena Dokic | 6-3 3-6 6-1 | Anna Smashnova | Match data |
| Apr 18, 2002* | Charleston | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Anna Smashnova | 6-1 6-3 | Jelena Dokic | Match data |
| Apr 5, 2002* | Sarasota | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Jelena Dokic | 6-1 6-0 | Anna Smashnova | Match data |
| Aug 22, 2000 | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Jelena Dokic | 6-1 6-0 | Anna Smashnova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Dokic | #945 | #4 | 3,338 | 2,031 | 208 | 175 | 54.3% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Anna Smashnova | #994 | #15 | 1,616 | 1,882 | 242 | 221 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jelena Dokic | Anna Smashnova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #236 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1999 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #43 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #47 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #8 | 1,999 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #68 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #132 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #15 | 1,778 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2004 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #124 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #49 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #349 | 1,525 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #47 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,499 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #46 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #88 | 1,605 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2008 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 43–25 | 63.2% | #16 | 1,793 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #56 | 1,527 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #16 | 1,857 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #138 | 1,513 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #32 | 1,732 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2011 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 6 | 2005 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #43 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #258 | 1,516 | 0 | 6 | 2006 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,700 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #921 | 1,648 | 0 | 12 |