H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jelena Dokic vs Asa Carlsson H2H: 1-0
Jelena Dokic holds a 1–0 lead over Asa Carlsson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jelena Dokic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jelena Dokic won the 2001 Rome second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2001* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Jelena Dokic | 6-3 6-2 | Asa Carlsson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Dokic | #945 | #4 | 3,338 | 2,031 | 208 | 175 | 54.3% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Asa Carlsson | #1,024 | #28 | 831 | 1,816 | 128 | 171 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jelena Dokic | Asa Carlsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #43 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #164 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #70 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #8 | 1,999 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #49 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #39 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #15 | 1,778 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #45 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #124 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #92 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #349 | 1,525 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #61 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,499 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #102 | 1,515 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #56 | 1,527 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #78 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 |
| 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #138 | 1,513 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #345 | 1,496 | 0 | 2 |
| 2011 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 6 | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #207 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 |
| 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #258 | 1,516 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |