H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jelena Dokic vs Barbara Rittner H2H: 2-1
Jelena Dokic holds a 2–1 lead over Barbara Rittner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jelena Dokic leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Barbara Rittner won the 2003 Indian Wells second round 6-1 5-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2003* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Barbara Rittner | 6-1 5-7 6-3 | Jelena Dokic | Match data |
| May 3, 2001* | Hamburg | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Jelena Dokic | 4-6 6-2 6-2 | Barbara Rittner | Match data |
| Nov 3, 2000* | Leipzig | WTA 500 | R16 | Carpet | Jelena Dokic | 7-6(6) 6-2 | Barbara Rittner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Dokic | #945 | #4 | 3,338 | 2,031 | 208 | 175 | 54.3% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Barbara Rittner | #438 | #24 | 661 | 1,883 | 209 | 217 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jelena Dokic | Barbara Rittner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1999 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #43 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #8 | 1,999 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #29 | 1,829 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2003 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #15 | 1,778 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #34 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2004 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #124 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #40 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2005 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #349 | 1,525 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,499 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #71 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2008 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #66 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #56 | 1,527 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #59 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #138 | 1,513 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #99 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2011 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #68 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #258 | 1,516 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #66 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #120 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #235 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 |