H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jelena Dokic vs Chanda Rubin H2H: 2-3

Chanda Rubin holds a 3–2 lead over Jelena Dokic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Chanda Rubin leads 3–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Jelena Dokic won the 2003 Zurich third round 6-1 5-7 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jelena Dokic
AUS Age 43 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 16, 2003* Zurich WTA 1000 R32 Hard Jelena Dokic #25 6-1 5-7 6-4 Chanda Rubin #10 Match data
Aug 1, 2003* San Diego WTA 500 R16 Hard Chanda Rubin #8 1-6 6-3 6-4 Jelena Dokic #12 Match data
Oct 26, 2002* Linz WTA 500 QF Hard Chanda Rubin #14 7-5 6-2 Jelena Dokic #8 Match data
Aug 9, 2002* Los Angeles WTA 500 SF Hard Chanda Rubin #21 6-0 6-2 Jelena Dokic #5 Match data
Oct 19, 2001* Zurich WTA 1000 R16 Hard Jelena Dokic #10 6-4 6-4 Chanda Rubin #36 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jelena Dokic #945 #4 3,338 2,031 208 175 54.3% 0 2 0 1 3 6
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jelena Dokic Chanda Rubin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0
15 1998 0–1 0.0% #349 1,497 0 0 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0
16 1999 11–10 52.4% #43 1,629 0 0 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0
17 2000 28–19 59.6% #24 1,769 0 0 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0
18 2001 53–23 69.7% #8 1,999 0 3 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0
19 2002 53–27 66.2% #9 1,897 0 5 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0
20 2003 28–30 48.3% #15 1,778 0 5 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0
21 2004 7–16 30.4% #124 1,582 0 5 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1
22 2005 2–5 28.6% #349 1,525 0 5 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1
23 2006 0–2 0.0% #587 1,499 0 5 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2
24 — — — — — — — 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3
25 2008 1–3 25.0% #179 1,480 0 5 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3
26 2009 6–9 40.0% #56 1,527 0 5 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5
27 2010 1–5 16.7% #138 1,513 0 5 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7
28 2011 15–16 48.4% #66 1,592 0 6 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7
29 2012 3–9 25.0% #258 1,516 0 6 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7
30 — — — — — — — 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7