H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jelena Dokic vs Denisa Chladkova H2H: 0-1
Denisa Chladkova holds a 1–0 lead over Jelena Dokic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Denisa Chladkova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Denisa Chladkova won the 2001 Knokke-Heist third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2001* | Knokke-Heist | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Denisa Chladkova | 6-4 6-2 | Jelena Dokic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Dokic | #945 | #4 | 3,338 | 2,031 | 208 | 175 | 54.3% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Denisa Chladkova | #655 | #31 | 983 | 1,740 | 129 | 165 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jelena Dokic | Denisa Chladkova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1999 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #43 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #77 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #8 | 1,999 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #54 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 4–19 | 17.4% | #119 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #15 | 1,778 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #58 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #124 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #50 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #349 | 1,525 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,499 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #63 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #43 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #54 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #56 | 1,527 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #127 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #138 | 1,513 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2011 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #258 | 1,516 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |