H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jelena Dokic vs Gala Leon Garcia H2H: 2-2
Jelena Dokic and Gala Leon Garcia are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Gala Leon Garcia leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gala Leon Garcia won the 2004 Indian Wells second round 6-4 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 52
Left-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2004* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Gala Leon Garcia | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | Jelena Dokic | Match data |
| Aug 1, 2002* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Jelena Dokic | 6-2 7-5 | Gala Leon Garcia | Match data |
| Jul 28, 2001* | Sopot | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Gala Leon Garcia | 6-2 6-4 | Jelena Dokic | Match data |
| Jun 29, 2000* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Jelena Dokic | 7-6(5) 6-1 | Gala Leon Garcia | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Dokic | #945 | #4 | 3,338 | 2,031 | 208 | 175 | 54.3% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Gala Leon Garcia | #361 | #27 | 978 | 1,837 | 117 | 141 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jelena Dokic | Gala Leon Garcia | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1999 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #43 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #8 | 1,999 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2002 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2003 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #15 | 1,778 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2004 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #124 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #349 | 1,525 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #89 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,499 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #56 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #53 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #53 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #56 | 1,527 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #31 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #138 | 1,513 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #41 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2011 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 10–23 | 30.3% | #130 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #258 | 1,516 | 0 | 6 | 2003 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #96 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #221 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 |