H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jelena Dokic vs Joannette Kruger H2H: 1-0
Jelena Dokic holds a 1–0 lead over Joannette Kruger in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jelena Dokic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jelena Dokic won the 2001 Rome quarterfinal 6-2 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 52
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2001* | Rome | WTA 1000 | QF | Clay | Jelena Dokic | 6-2 7-6(5) | Joannette Kruger | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Dokic | #945 | #4 | 3,338 | 2,031 | 208 | 175 | 54.3% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Joannette Kruger | #972 | #21 | 1,280 | 1,879 | 147 | 162 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jelena Dokic | Joannette Kruger | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1999 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #43 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #8 | 1,999 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #128 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #15 | 1,778 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #79 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #124 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #30 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2005 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #349 | 1,525 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #126 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,499 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #27 | 1,791 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #30 | 1,721 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2008 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #129 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #56 | 1,527 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #59 | 1,659 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #138 | 1,513 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #46 | 1,643 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2011 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #455 | 1,591 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #258 | 1,516 | 0 | 6 | 2003 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #853 | 1,531 | 0 | 2 |