H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jelena Dokic vs Julia Schruff H2H: 0-1
Julia Schruff holds a 1–0 lead over Jelena Dokic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Julia Schruff leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julia Schruff won the 2006 Auckland third round 5-7 7-6(3) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 43
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2006* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Julia Schruff | 5-7 7-6(3) 6-1 | Jelena Dokic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Dokic | #945 | #4 | 3,338 | 2,031 | 208 | 175 | 54.3% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Julia Schruff | #1,200 | #52 | 536 | 1,665 | 48 | 80 | 37.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jelena Dokic | Julia Schruff | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1999 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #43 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #8 | 1,999 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2002 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2003 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #15 | 1,778 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #117 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #124 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #108 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #349 | 1,525 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #81 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,499 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #119 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #132 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #56 | 1,527 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #131 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #138 | 1,513 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2011 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #258 | 1,516 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |