H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jelena Dokic vs Kristina Brandi H2H: 3-1
Jelena Dokic holds a 3–1 lead over Kristina Brandi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Jelena Dokic leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jelena Dokic won the 2004 Miami third round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
PUR
Age 49
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2004* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Jelena Dokic | 7-5 6-4 | Kristina Brandi | Match data |
| Jul 4, 2000* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Jelena Dokic | 6-1 6-3 | Kristina Brandi | Match data |
| Jun 19, 2000 | S Hertogenbosch | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Kristina Brandi | 6-0 6-1 | Jelena Dokic | Match data |
| Jan 22, 1999* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Jelena Dokic | 6-4 7-5 | Kristina Brandi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Dokic | #945 | #4 | 3,338 | 2,031 | 208 | 175 | 54.3% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Kristina Brandi | #917 | #27 | 983 | 1,722 | 103 | 150 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jelena Dokic | Kristina Brandi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1999 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #43 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #8 | 1,999 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #15 | 1,778 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #88 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #124 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #71 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #349 | 1,525 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #55 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,499 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #27 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #77 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2008 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #207 | 1,548 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #56 | 1,527 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #75 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #138 | 1,513 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #47 | 1,611 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2011 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 6 | 2005 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #89 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #258 | 1,516 | 0 | 6 | 2006 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #158 | 1,426 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,414 | 0 | 1 |