H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jelena Dokic vs Lina Krasnoroutskaya H2H: 4-0
Jelena Dokic holds a 4–0 lead over Lina Krasnoroutskaya in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jelena Dokic leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jelena Dokic won the 2002 Tokyo fourth round 6-2 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 42
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2002* | Tokyo | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Jelena Dokic | 6-2 7-6(5) | Lina Krasnoroutskaya | Match data |
| Oct 4, 2001* | Moscow | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Jelena Dokic | 6-3 5-7 7-5 | Lina Krasnoroutskaya | Match data |
| Sep 21, 2001* | Tokyo | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Jelena Dokic | 6-4 6-4 | Lina Krasnoroutskaya | Match data |
| Oct 4, 2000* | Tokyo | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Jelena Dokic | 6-4 7-6(1) | Lina Krasnoroutskaya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Dokic | #945 | #4 | 3,338 | 2,031 | 208 | 175 | 54.3% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Lina Krasnoroutskaya | #424 | #25 | 1,173 | 1,807 | 65 | 70 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jelena Dokic | Lina Krasnoroutskaya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #165 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1999 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #43 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #132 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #34 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #8 | 1,999 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #160 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #28 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #15 | 1,778 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #141 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #124 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #424 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #349 | 1,525 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,499 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2008 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #56 | 1,527 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #138 | 1,513 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2011 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #258 | 1,516 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |