H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Jelena Dokic vs Lindsay Davenport H2H: 0-9

Lindsay Davenport holds a 9–0 lead over Jelena Dokic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 6–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2004 Tokyo semifinal 6-1 6-0.

AUS Age 43 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 9
9 main draw meetings
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 8, 2004* Tokyo WTA 1000 SF Carpet Lindsay Davenport #6 6-1 6-0 Jelena Dokic #17 Match data
Aug 22, 2003* New Haven WTA 500 R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #4 6-2 6-1 Jelena Dokic #23 Match data
Jul 27, 2002* Stanford WTA 500 QF Hard Lindsay Davenport #9 6-2 6-2 Jelena Dokic #6 Match data
Nov 5, 2001* WTA Tour Championships WTA Finals QF Hard Lindsay Davenport #1 6-4 6-2 Jelena Dokic #8 Match data
Oct 28, 2001* Linz WTA 500 F Hard Lindsay Davenport #3 6-4 6-1 Jelena Dokic #9 Match data
Oct 21, 2001* Zurich WTA 1000 F Hard Lindsay Davenport #3 6-3 6-1 Jelena Dokic #10 Match data
Jul 4, 2001* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Lindsay Davenport #3 7-5 6-4 Jelena Dokic #16 Match data
Jan 17, 2001* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 4-6 6-4 6-3 Jelena Dokic #25 Match data
Jul 8, 2000* Wimbledon Grand Slam SF Grass Lindsay Davenport #2 6-4 6-2 Jelena Dokic #30 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jelena Dokic #945 #4 3,338 2,031 208 175 54.3% 0 2 0 1 3 6
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jelena Dokic Lindsay Davenport
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1998 0–1 0.0% #349 1,497 0 0 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0
16 1999 11–10 52.4% #43 1,629 0 0 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0
17 2000 28–19 59.6% #24 1,769 0 0 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1
18 2001 53–23 69.7% #8 1,999 0 3 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3
19 2002 53–27 66.2% #9 1,897 0 5 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4
20 2003 28–30 48.3% #15 1,778 0 5 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6
21 2004 7–16 30.4% #124 1,582 0 5 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12
22 2005 2–5 28.6% #349 1,525 0 5 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18
23 2006 0–2 0.0% #587 1,499 0 5 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25
24 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29
25 2008 1–3 25.0% #179 1,480 0 5 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36
26 2009 6–9 40.0% #56 1,527 0 5 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36
27 2010 1–5 16.7% #138 1,513 0 5 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37
28 2011 15–16 48.4% #66 1,592 0 6 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44
29 2012 3–9 25.0% #258 1,516 0 6 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50
30 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50
31 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52
32 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54