H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jelena Dokic vs Maria Vento-Kabchi H2H: 0-1
Maria Vento-Kabchi holds a 1–0 lead over Jelena Dokic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maria Vento-Kabchi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Vento-Kabchi won the 2003 Stanford quarterfinal 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
VEN
Age 52
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2003* | Stanford | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Maria Vento-Kabchi | 6-4 6-3 | Jelena Dokic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Dokic | #945 | #4 | 3,338 | 2,031 | 208 | 175 | 54.3% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Maria Vento-Kabchi | #996 | #26 | 1,053 | 1,716 | 95 | 156 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jelena Dokic | Maria Vento-Kabchi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1999 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #43 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #8 | 1,999 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #551 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2003 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #15 | 1,778 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #166 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #124 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #86 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #349 | 1,525 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #139 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,499 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #51 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #43 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #110 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #56 | 1,527 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #138 | 1,513 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #155 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2011 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #258 | 1,516 | 0 | 6 | 2003 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #44 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #48 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #62 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #324 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |