H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Jelena Dokic vs Martina Hingis H2H: 2-3

Martina Hingis holds a 3–2 lead over Jelena Dokic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Martina Hingis leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Jelena Dokic leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jelena Dokic won the 2002 Montreal quarterfinal 6-4 6-3.

AUS Age 43 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
SUI Age 45 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 17, 2002* Montreal WTA 1000 QF Hard Jelena Dokic #5 6-4 6-3 Martina Hingis #8 Match data
Sep 4, 2001* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Martina Hingis #1 6-4 6-0 Jelena Dokic #13 Match data
Oct 13, 2000* Zurich WTA 1000 R16 Hard Martina Hingis #1 6-3 6-2 Jelena Dokic #31 Match data
Jun 23, 1999* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Jelena Dokic #129 6-2 6-0 Martina Hingis #1 Match data
Jan 24, 1999* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Martina Hingis #2 6-1 6-2 Jelena Dokic #349 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jelena Dokic #945 #4 3,338 2,031 208 175 54.3% 0 2 0 1 3 6
Martina Hingis #19 #1 6,976 2,385 515 126 80.3% 5 18 2 10 8 43

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jelena Dokic Martina Hingis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1994 5–3 62.5% #87 1,595 0 0
14 1995 18–12 60.0% #16 1,826 0 0
15 1998 0–1 0.0% #349 1,497 0 0 1996 45–15 75.0% #6 2,160 0 2
16 1999 11–10 52.4% #43 1,629 0 0 1997 72–5 93.5% #1 2,321 3 14
17 2000 28–19 59.6% #24 1,769 0 0 1998 60–12 83.3% #2 2,264 4 19
18 2001 53–23 69.7% #8 1,999 0 3 1999 70–12 85.4% #1 2,285 5 26
19 2002 53–27 66.2% #9 1,897 0 5 2000 78–10 88.6% #1 2,314 5 35
20 2003 28–30 48.3% #15 1,778 0 5 2001 60–15 80.0% #4 2,123 5 38
21 2004 7–16 30.4% #124 1,582 0 5 2002 34–10 77.3% #10 2,050 5 40
22 2005 2–5 28.6% #349 1,525 0 5
23 2006 0–2 0.0% #587 1,499 0 5
24 2005 0–1 0.0% 2,020 5 40
25 2008 1–3 25.0% #179 1,480 0 5 2006 53–19 73.6% #7 2,013 5 42
26 2009 6–9 40.0% #56 1,527 0 5 2007 20–12 62.5% #19 1,855 5 43
27 2010 1–5 16.7% #138 1,513 0 5
28 2011 15–16 48.4% #66 1,592 0 6
29 2012 3–9 25.0% #258 1,516 0 6