H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jelena Dokic vs Mary Pierce H2H: 3-2

Jelena Dokic holds a 3–2 lead over Mary Pierce in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Jelena Dokic leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 2003 US Open second round 6-2 6-7(5) 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jelena Dokic
AUS Age 43 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 28, 2003* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Mary Pierce #64 6-2 6-7(5) 7-6(5) Jelena Dokic #23 Match data
May 9, 2002* Berlin WTA 1000 R32 Clay Jelena Dokic #9 1-6 6-3 6-1 Mary Pierce #195 Match data
Apr 11, 2002* Amelia Island WTA 500 R32 Clay Jelena Dokic #8 6-2 6-0 Mary Pierce #250 Match data
Apr 22, 2000* Hilton Head WTA 1000 QF Clay Mary Pierce #4 6-3 6-1 Jelena Dokic #40 Match data
Jun 30, 1999* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Jelena Dokic #129 6-4 6-3 Mary Pierce #7 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jelena Dokic #945 #4 3,338 2,031 208 175 54.3% 0 2 0 1 3 6
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jelena Dokic Mary Pierce
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0
15 1998 0–1 0.0% #349 1,497 0 0 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0
16 1999 11–10 52.4% #43 1,629 0 0 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1
17 2000 28–19 59.6% #24 1,769 0 0 1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4
18 2001 53–23 69.7% #8 1,999 0 3 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5
19 2002 53–27 66.2% #9 1,897 0 5 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5
20 2003 28–30 48.3% #15 1,778 0 5 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7
21 2004 7–16 30.4% #124 1,582 0 5 1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7
22 2005 2–5 28.6% #349 1,525 0 5 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8
23 2006 0–2 0.0% #587 1,499 0 5 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12
24 — — — — — — — 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13
25 2008 1–3 25.0% #179 1,480 0 5 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15
26 2009 6–9 40.0% #56 1,527 0 5 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15
27 2010 1–5 16.7% #138 1,513 0 5 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15
28 2011 15–16 48.4% #66 1,592 0 6 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15
29 2012 3–9 25.0% #258 1,516 0 6 2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16
30 — — — — — — — 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18
31 — — — — — — — 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18