H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jelena Dokic vs Monica Seles H2H: 1-3
Monica Seles holds a 3–1 lead over Jelena Dokic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Monica Seles leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Jelena Dokic leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jelena Dokic won the 2002 Paris semifinal 6-3 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 52
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2002* | Paris | WTA 500 | SF | Carpet | Jelena Dokic | 6-3 3-6 6-4 | Monica Seles | Match data |
| Sep 16, 2001* | Bahia | WTA 500 | F | Hard | Monica Seles | 6-3 6-3 | Jelena Dokic | Match data |
| Aug 13, 2001 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Monica Seles | 6-3 7-6(3) | Jelena Dokic | Match data |
| May 20, 2000* | Rome | WTA 1000 | QF | Clay | Monica Seles | 6-1 3-6 6-3 | Jelena Dokic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Dokic | #945 | #4 | 3,338 | 2,031 | 208 | 175 | 54.3% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Monica Seles | #223 | #1 | 4,056 | 2,540 | 578 | 121 | 82.7% | 9 | 12 | 3 | 7 | 22 | 53 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jelena Dokic | Monica Seles | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #86 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 33–9 | 78.6% | #6 | 2,002 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 1999 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #43 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 55–6 | 90.2% | #2 | 2,295 | 1 | 10 |
| 17 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 74–6 | 92.5% | #1 | 2,443 | 4 | 20 |
| 18 | 2001 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #8 | 1,999 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 70–5 | 93.3% | #1 | 2,499 | 7 | 30 |
| 19 | 2002 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 17–2 | 89.5% | #8 | 2,485 | 8 | 32 |
| 20 | 2003 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #15 | 1,778 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2004 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #124 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 11–1 | 91.7% | #1 | 2,487 | 8 | 33 |
| 22 | 2005 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #349 | 1,525 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 43–8 | 84.3% | #2 | 2,342 | 9 | 38 |
| 23 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,499 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 45–14 | 76.3% | #5 | 2,159 | 9 | 41 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 42–13 | 76.4% | #6 | 2,174 | 9 | 43 |
| 25 | 2008 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 36–12 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,116 | 9 | 44 |
| 26 | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #56 | 1,527 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 51–12 | 81.0% | #4 | 2,144 | 9 | 47 |
| 27 | 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #138 | 1,513 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 40–10 | 80.0% | #10 | 2,127 | 9 | 51 |
| 28 | 2011 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 46–13 | 78.0% | #7 | 2,088 | 9 | 53 |
| 29 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #258 | 1,516 | 0 | 6 | 2003 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #60 | 1,993 | 9 | 53 |