H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jelena Dokic vs Nicole Pratt H2H: 3-0
Jelena Dokic holds a 3–0 lead over Nicole Pratt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jelena Dokic leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jelena Dokic won the 2004 Miami second round W/O.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 53
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2004* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jelena Dokic | (w/o) | Nicole Pratt | Match data |
| Mar 4, 2004* | Doha | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Jelena Dokic | 0-6 6-3 6-4 | Nicole Pratt | Match data |
| Apr 20, 2000* | Hilton Head | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Jelena Dokic | 6-4 6-1 | Nicole Pratt | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Dokic | #945 | #4 | 3,338 | 2,031 | 208 | 175 | 54.3% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Nicole Pratt | #1,043 | #35 | 924 | 1,764 | 156 | 217 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jelena Dokic | Nicole Pratt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1999 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #43 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #201 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #8 | 1,999 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #201 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #203 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #15 | 1,778 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #172 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #124 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #224 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #349 | 1,525 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,499 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #110 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #113 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #56 | 1,527 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #56 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #138 | 1,513 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #54 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2011 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #258 | 1,516 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #48 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #53 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #50 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #126 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #77 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1043 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 |