H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jelena Dokic vs Rita Grande H2H: 4-1
Jelena Dokic holds a 4–1 lead over Rita Grande in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Jelena Dokic leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jelena Dokic won the 2003 Vienna fourth round 6-2 5-7 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4
–
1
5 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 51
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2003* | Vienna | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Jelena Dokic | 6-2 5-7 6-2 | Rita Grande | Match data |
| Aug 9, 2002* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Jelena Dokic | 6-4 6-1 | Rita Grande | Match data |
| Oct 18, 2000* | Shanghai | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Jelena Dokic | 7-5 6-4 | Rita Grande | Match data |
| Apr 13, 2000* | Amelia Island | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Jelena Dokic | 6-2 6-3 | Rita Grande | Match data |
| Jun 9, 1999* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Rita Grande | 2-6 6-3 9-7 | Jelena Dokic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Dokic | #945 | #4 | 3,338 | 2,031 | 208 | 175 | 54.3% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Rita Grande | #1,172 | #24 | 1,020 | 1,755 | 172 | 218 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jelena Dokic | Rita Grande | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1999 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #43 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #8 | 1,999 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #146 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #15 | 1,778 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #72 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #124 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #71 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #349 | 1,525 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #44 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,499 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #59 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #56 | 1,527 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #24 | 1,742 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #138 | 1,513 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #46 | 1,641 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2011 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 6 | 2003 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #70 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #258 | 1,516 | 0 | 6 | 2004 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1088 | 1,518 | 0 | 3 |