H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Jelena Dokic vs Samantha Reeves H2H: 1-0

Jelena Dokic holds a 1–0 lead over Samantha Reeves in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jelena Dokic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jelena Dokic won the 2001 Bahia quarterfinal 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jelena Dokic
AUS Age 43 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Samantha Reeves
USA Age 47 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jelena Dokic #12 6-3 6-2 Samantha Reeves #193 Match data Sep 15, 2001* QF Bahia Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jelena Dokic #945 #4 3,338 2,033 212 177 54.5% 0 2 0 1 3 6
Samantha Reeves #864 #62 523 1,629 30 59 33.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jelena Dokic Samantha Reeves
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1998 0–1 0.0% #349 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1999 11–10 52.4% #43 1,611 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2000 32–21 60.4% #24 1,784 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2001 53–23 69.7% #8 2,002 0 3 — — — — — — —
19 2002 53–27 66.2% #9 1,899 0 5 1998 2–8 20.0% #111 1,480 0 0
20 2003 28–30 48.3% #15 1,778 0 5 1999 4–8 33.3% #121 1,480 0 0
21 2004 7–16 30.4% #124 1,572 0 5 2000 1–4 20.0% #171 1,446 0 0
22 2005 2–5 28.6% #349 1,517 0 5 2001 4–3 57.1% #106 1,515 0 0
23 2006 0–2 0.0% #587 1,491 0 5 2002 8–14 36.4% #108 1,544 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2003 8–10 44.4% #74 1,588 0 0
25 2008 1–3 25.0% #179 1,473 0 5 2004 3–12 20.0% #198 1,526 0 0
26 2009 6–9 40.0% #56 1,523 0 5 — — — — — — —
27 2010 1–5 16.7% #138 1,510 0 5 — — — — — — —
28 2011 15–16 48.4% #66 1,592 0 6 — — — — — — —
29 2012 3–9 25.0% #258 1,516 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jelena Dokic Samantha Reeves
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1999 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2000 15 13 28 53.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 26 11 37 70.3% 16 8 24 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2002 22 13 35 62.9% 20 7 27 74.1% 8 2 10 80.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1998 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2003 15 14 29 51.7% 8 9 17 47.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1999 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2004 3 6 9 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2005 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
23 2006 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 5 7 12 41.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2008 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 1 5 6 16.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2009 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2010 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2011 8 10 18 44.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 103 94 197 52.3% 61 49 110 55.5% 30 17 47 63.8% 18 17 35 51.4% — 14 27 41 34.1% 11 22 33 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 5 8 37.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 76/151 of Jelena Dokic's and 8/33 of Samantha Reeves's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jelena Dokic Samantha Reeves
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2003 7/58 4.1 8.0 59.4% 70.1% 43.9% 62.0% 39.0% 60.0% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2004 3/23 2.3 10.3 53.0% 68.8% 31.9% 50.9% 55.0% 51.3% 32.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2006 1/2 1.0 11.0 59.2% 67.2% 42.5% 63.6% 40.0% 57.1% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 5/18 1.0 7.0 61.8% 57.8% 37.8% 49.5% 49.5% 50.1% 43.0%
25 2008 4/4 1.8 7.0 55.1% 56.4% 27.9% 29.6% 33.0% 43.8% 32.7% 2004 3/15 1.7 7.0 61.2% 44.9% 29.9% 42.6% 32.1% 39.1% 37.1%
26 2009 14/15 3.4 7.6 60.2% 66.2% 44.7% 51.6% 53.6% 57.6% 40.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2010 6/6 4.0 8.0 48.3% 59.0% 42.7% 56.3% 41.5% 50.6% 36.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2011 30/31 4.0 7.6 56.5% 65.5% 41.2% 55.8% 48.2% 55.0% 42.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 11/12 2.8 8.5 52.4% 68.4% 48.0% 49.7% 48.6% 58.5% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 76/389 3.5 7.9 56.0% 65.6% 42.2% 53.3% 47.2% 55.4% 40.5% — 8/89 1.3 7.0 61.6% 53.0% 34.9% 46.9% 43.0% 45.9% 40.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jelena Dokic Samantha Reeves
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1998 1497 107.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1999 1612 133.7 — — — — -50 -32 +56 50.0% +0.10 5–5 (50%) 0–2 — -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2000 1784 148.2 — — — — -86 -71 +45 59.7% +0.69 6–7 (46%) 9–5 (64%) 106.9 -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 2003 163.4 — — — — -34 -133 -99 66.9% +1.26 11–9 (55%) 7–5 (58%) 101.9 -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2002 1899 156.5 — — — — -16 +81 +103 64.7% +0.94 17–8 (68%) 10–4 (71%) 108.9 +0.53 1998 1480 114.3 — — — — +27 +68 — 29.2% -1.17 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — -0.17
20 2003 1779 142.2 +2.27 +0.61 1.076 51.3% +34 +61 +149 48.5% -0.25 9–11 (45%) 8–4 (67%) 99.5 +1.66 1999 1481 106.1 — — — — +28 +49 — 34.6% -1.65 1–1 1–0 — +0.52
21 2004 1573 109.3 -1.18 -3.35 0.666 42.8% +137 +131 +216 32.1% -1.30 4–5 (44%) 2–4 (33%) 95.1 +1.39 2000 1447 92.1 — — — — — +34 — 18.2% -1.45 1–0 0–1 — +0.50
22 2005 1517 98.3 — — — — +150 +121 — 42.9% -0.79 0–2 1–1 — +0.38 2001 1515 113.3 — — — — +30 — — 47.1% +0.12 3–0 (100%) 1–0 — +0.29
23 2006 1491 99.0 -1.59 -1.92 0.960 48.8% — — — 33.3% -1.17 0–2 0–2 — +0.08 2002 1545 121.7 — — — — +16 -68 — 42.6% -0.48 3–7 (30%) 4–5 (44%) 96.7 -0.91
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1589 112.2 -1.00 +0.72 0.861 46.5% -29 -69 +14 41.0% -0.92 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — -0.54
25 2008 1474 92.2 -2.56 -3.96 0.581 38.0% — — — 28.6% -1.71 1–0 — — +0.02 2004 1526 110.0 -3.84 -1.12 0.609 38.9% -9 -32 — 24.2% -1.70 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — -0.74
26 2009 1523 124.6 +1.93 -1.71 0.946 48.8% +118 +63 — 41.7% -0.33 5–3 (63%) 1–3 (25%) 102.9 -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2010 1510 111.3 -2.42 -1.14 0.741 43.8% +104 — — 23.1% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2011 1592 124.8 -0.96 -1.42 0.942 48.7% +38 -55 +172 49.3% -0.34 4–5 (44%) 7–1 (88%) 104.3 -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 1517 117.2 +0.82 -2.07 0.988 50.0% +50 — — 39.1% -0.30 0–3 (0%) 0–2 — +0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2033 149.9 -0.09 -1.57 0.907 48.0% +6 +1 +68 54.7% +0.30 62–62 (50%) 45–34 (57%) 104.1 +0.56 — 1630 116.7 -2.07 +0.03 0.755 43.6% +12 -24 +14 35.8% -0.99 15–15 (50%) 8–9 (47%) 103.4 -1.18

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.