H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jelena Dokic vs Silvia Farina Elia H2H: 2-1
Jelena Dokic holds a 2–1 lead over Silvia Farina Elia in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jelena Dokic leads 1–0 on carpet, while Silvia Farina Elia leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Silvia Farina Elia won the 2002 Strasbourg final 6-4 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 54
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2002* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | F | Clay | Silvia Farina Elia | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Jelena Dokic | Match data |
| Oct 20, 2001* | Zurich | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Jelena Dokic | 6-4 7-6(3) | Silvia Farina Elia | Match data |
| Oct 6, 2001* | Moscow | WTA 1000 | SF | Carpet | Jelena Dokic | 6-4 6-3 | Silvia Farina Elia | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Dokic | #945 | #4 | 3,338 | 2,031 | 208 | 175 | 54.3% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Silvia Farina Elia | #32 | #11 | 1,838 | 1,943 | 365 | 309 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jelena Dokic | Silvia Farina Elia | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1999 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #43 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #8 | 1,999 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #194 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 28–30 | 48.3% | #15 | 1,778 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #124 | 1,582 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #85 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #349 | 1,525 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #52 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #587 | 1,499 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #34 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,480 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #43 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #56 | 1,527 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #19 | 1,901 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #138 | 1,513 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #26 | 1,782 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2011 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #63 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #258 | 1,516 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #14 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 42–28 | 60.0% | #17 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #24 | 1,719 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #20 | 1,770 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #32 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 |