H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jelena Jankovic vs Amanda Coetzer H2H: 0-2
Amanda Coetzer holds a 2–0 lead over Jelena Jankovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Amanda Coetzer leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amanda Coetzer won the 2003 Australian Open second round 6-2 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 41
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 54
Right-Handed
158 cm / 5'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2003* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Amanda Coetzer | 6-2 4-6 6-4 | Jelena Jankovic | Match data |
| Aug 6, 2002* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Amanda Coetzer | 6-2 6-2 | Jelena Jankovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Jankovic | #970 | #1 | 9,200 | 2,132 | 547 | 332 | 62.2% | 0 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 15 |
| Amanda Coetzer | #289 | #3 | 3,380 | 2,051 | 491 | 307 | 61.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jelena Jankovic | Amanda Coetzer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #364 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #152 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #63 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2003 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #85 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #76 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2004 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #28 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #68 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #17 | 1,857 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 45–28 | 61.6% | #12 | 1,915 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #15 | 1,991 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2007 | 73–26 | 73.7% | #3 | 1,966 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #18 | 1,885 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2008 | 63–18 | 77.8% | #1 | 2,087 | 0 | 9 | 1995 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #19 | 1,910 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2009 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #8 | 1,948 | 0 | 11 | 1996 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #14 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2010 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #8 | 1,794 | 0 | 12 | 1997 | 60–25 | 70.6% | #4 | 2,013 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2011 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #14 | 1,804 | 0 | 12 | 1998 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #17 | 1,887 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2012 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #22 | 1,737 | 0 | 12 | 1999 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #11 | 1,815 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2013 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #8 | 1,918 | 0 | 13 | 2000 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,892 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2014 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,795 | 0 | 13 | 2001 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #19 | 1,786 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 2015 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #21 | 1,851 | 0 | 15 | 2002 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #21 | 1,795 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | 2016 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #54 | 1,738 | 0 | 15 | 2003 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #25 | 1,738 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | 2017 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #158 | 1,576 | 0 | 15 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #286 | 1,718 | 0 | 9 |