H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jelena Jankovic vs Anabel Medina Garrigues H2H: 7-1

Jelena Jankovic holds a 7–1 lead over Anabel Medina Garrigues in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Jelena Jankovic leads 4–1 on clay and 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jelena Jankovic won the 2011 Rome fourth round 6-4 2-6 6-2.

SRB Age 41 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
7 1
8 main draw meetings
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 13, 2011* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Jelena Jankovic #9 6-4 2-6 6-2 Anabel Medina Garrigues #42 Match data
Mar 25, 2011* Miami WTA 1000 R16 Hard Jelena Jankovic #7 6-1 6-3 Anabel Medina Garrigues #73 Match data
May 14, 2010* Madrid WTA 1000 R16 Clay Jelena Jankovic #4 6-2 6-0 Anabel Medina Garrigues #54 Match data
Apr 11, 2009* Marbella WTA 250 SF Clay Jelena Jankovic #4 7-5 6-2 Anabel Medina Garrigues #20 Match data
Mar 14, 2008* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R16 Hard Jelena Jankovic #4 6-3 6-3 Anabel Medina Garrigues #31 Match data
May 26, 2007* Strasbourg WTA 500 SF Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #27 (w/o) Jelena Jankovic #4 Match data
May 10, 2007* Berlin WTA 1000 R32 Clay Jelena Jankovic #6 6-3 2-6 7-5 Anabel Medina Garrigues #32 Match data
Oct 6, 2005* Filderstadt WTA 500 R32 Hard Jelena Jankovic #17 6-2 6-2 Anabel Medina Garrigues #29 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jelena Jankovic #970 #1 9,200 2,132 547 332 62.2% 0 6 0 3 6 15
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,852 310 275 53.0% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jelena Jankovic Anabel Medina Garrigues
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 1–1 50.0% #364 1,512 0 0
17 2002 2–4 33.3% #196 1,528 0 0 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,494 0 0
18 2003 4–9 30.8% #85 1,505 0 0 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,563 0 1
19 2004 27–25 51.9% #28 1,754 0 1 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1
20 2005 36–29 55.4% #22 1,732 0 1 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1
21 2006 45–28 61.6% #12 1,915 0 1 2004 25–22 53.2% #39 1,716 0 2
22 2007 73–26 73.7% #3 1,966 0 5 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,747 0 4
23 2008 63–18 77.8% #1 2,087 0 9 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,690 0 6
24 2009 42–19 68.9% #8 1,948 0 11 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,694 0 7
25 2010 35–22 61.4% #8 1,794 0 12 2008 41–24 63.1% #22 1,833 0 8
26 2011 38–22 63.3% #14 1,804 0 12 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9
27 2012 31–27 53.4% #22 1,737 0 12 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,565 0 9
28 2013 46–21 68.7% #8 1,918 0 13 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,774 0 11
29 2014 38–22 63.3% #15 1,795 0 13 2012 23–25 47.9% #50 1,629 0 11
30 2015 39–21 65.0% #21 1,851 0 15 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,553 0 11
31 2016 21–19 52.5% #54 1,738 0 15 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,501 0 11
32 2017 6–19 24.0% #158 1,576 0 15