H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Jelena Jankovic vs Cara Black H2H: 1-0
Jelena Jankovic holds a 1–0 lead over Cara Black in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jelena Jankovic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jelena Jankovic won the 2008 Beijing Olympics second round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 41
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ZIM
Age 47
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2008* | Beijing Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Hard | Jelena Jankovic | 6-3 6-3 | Cara Black | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Jankovic | #970 | #1 | 9,200 | 2,138 | 550 | 335 | 62.1% | 0 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 15 |
| Cara Black | #679 | #31 | 869 | 1,772 | 115 | 152 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jelena Jankovic | Cara Black | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #364 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2003 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #85 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2004 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #28 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #44 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #50 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 45–28 | 61.6% | #12 | 1,925 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #41 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 73–26 | 73.7% | #3 | 1,976 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #58 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 66–19 | 77.6% | #1 | 2,091 | 0 | 9 | 2002 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #56 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2009 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #8 | 1,952 | 0 | 11 | 2003 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #51 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2010 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #8 | 1,797 | 0 | 12 | 2004 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #138 | 1,473 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2011 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #14 | 1,794 | 0 | 12 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #179 | 1,504 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2012 | 31–28 | 52.5% | #22 | 1,732 | 0 | 12 | 2006 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #288 | 1,507 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2013 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #8 | 1,920 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2014 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,796 | 0 | 13 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #660 | 1,489 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2015 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #21 | 1,858 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2016 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #54 | 1,740 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2017 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #158 | 1,577 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |