H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jelena Jankovic vs Conchita Martínez H2H: 1-0
Jelena Jankovic holds a 1–0 lead over Conchita Martínez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jelena Jankovic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jelena Jankovic won the 2005 Amelia Island third round 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 41
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 54
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2005* | Amelia Island | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Jelena Jankovic | 6-0 6-3 | Conchita Martínez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Jankovic | #970 | #1 | 9,200 | 2,132 | 547 | 332 | 62.2% | 0 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 15 |
| Conchita Martínez | #1,498 | #2 | 3,180 | 2,263 | 669 | 275 | 70.9% | 1 | 9 | 0 | 4 | 19 | 33 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jelena Jankovic | Conchita Martínez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #364 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 14–6 | 70.0% | #41 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 35–9 | 79.5% | #7 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 2003 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #85 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 38–10 | 79.2% | #11 | 2,063 | 0 | 7 |
| 19 | 2004 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #28 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 36–12 | 75.0% | #9 | 2,076 | 0 | 10 |
| 20 | 2005 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #8 | 2,054 | 0 | 11 |
| 21 | 2006 | 45–28 | 61.6% | #12 | 1,915 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 66–13 | 83.5% | #4 | 2,158 | 0 | 16 |
| 22 | 2007 | 73–26 | 73.7% | #3 | 1,966 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 51–14 | 78.5% | #3 | 2,065 | 1 | 20 |
| 23 | 2008 | 63–18 | 77.8% | #1 | 2,087 | 0 | 9 | 1995 | 57–10 | 85.1% | #2 | 2,182 | 1 | 26 |
| 24 | 2009 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #8 | 1,948 | 0 | 11 | 1996 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #4 | 2,074 | 1 | 28 |
| 25 | 2010 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #8 | 1,794 | 0 | 12 | 1997 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #12 | 2,011 | 1 | 28 |
| 26 | 2011 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #14 | 1,804 | 0 | 12 | 1998 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #8 | 1,968 | 1 | 30 |
| 27 | 2012 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #22 | 1,737 | 0 | 12 | 1999 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,898 | 1 | 31 |
| 28 | 2013 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #8 | 1,918 | 0 | 13 | 2000 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #5 | 1,951 | 1 | 32 |
| 29 | 2014 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,795 | 0 | 13 | 2001 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #35 | 1,852 | 1 | 32 |
| 30 | 2015 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #21 | 1,851 | 0 | 15 | 2002 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #34 | 1,756 | 1 | 32 |
| 31 | 2016 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #54 | 1,738 | 0 | 15 | 2003 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #18 | 1,756 | 1 | 32 |
| 32 | 2017 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #158 | 1,576 | 0 | 15 | 2004 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #42 | 1,772 | 1 | 32 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #31 | 1,812 | 1 | 33 |