H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jelena Jankovic vs Emmanuelle Gagliardi H2H: 0-1
Emmanuelle Gagliardi holds a 1–0 lead over Jelena Jankovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Emmanuelle Gagliardi leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Emmanuelle Gagliardi won the 2003 Rome second round 7-5 2-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 41
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 50
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2003* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | 7-5 2-6 7-5 | Jelena Jankovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Jankovic | #970 | #1 | 9,200 | 2,132 | 547 | 332 | 62.2% | 0 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 15 |
| Emmanuelle Gagliardi | #736 | #42 | 781 | 1,695 | 117 | 182 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jelena Jankovic | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #364 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2003 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #85 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2004 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #28 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #78 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 45–28 | 61.6% | #12 | 1,915 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #101 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 73–26 | 73.7% | #3 | 1,966 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 63–18 | 77.8% | #1 | 2,087 | 0 | 9 | 2000 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #95 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #8 | 1,948 | 0 | 11 | 2001 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #69 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #8 | 1,794 | 0 | 12 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #61 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #14 | 1,804 | 0 | 12 | 2003 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #56 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #22 | 1,737 | 0 | 12 | 2004 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #105 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2013 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #8 | 1,918 | 0 | 13 | 2005 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2014 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,795 | 0 | 13 | 2006 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #115 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2015 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #21 | 1,851 | 0 | 15 | 2007 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #131 | 1,409 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2016 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #54 | 1,738 | 0 | 15 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #261 | 1,401 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2017 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #158 | 1,576 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |