H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jelena Jankovic vs Jarmila Wolfe H2H: 3-0

Jelena Jankovic holds a 3–0 lead over Jarmila Wolfe in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jelena Jankovic leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jelena Jankovic won the 2009 Roland Garros third round 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jelena Jankovic
SRB Age 41 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Jarmila Wolfe
AUS Age 39 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 30, 2009* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Jelena Jankovic #5 6-1 6-1 Jarmila Wolfe #73 Match data
Aug 29, 2007* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Jelena Jankovic #3 6-2 7-6(2) Jarmila Wolfe #101 Match data
Jun 28, 2007* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Jelena Jankovic #3 6-1 6-1 Jarmila Wolfe #105 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jelena Jankovic #970 #1 9,200 2,132 547 332 62.2% 0 6 0 3 6 15
Jarmila Wolfe #623 #25 2,060 1,799 104 137 43.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jelena Jankovic Jarmila Wolfe
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 1–1 50.0% #364 1,512 0 0 2003 2–1 66.7% #195 1,532 0 0
17 2002 2–4 33.3% #196 1,528 0 0 2004 0–1 0.0% #222 1,515 0 0
18 2003 4–9 30.8% #85 1,505 0 0 2005 2–2 50.0% #147 1,538 0 0
19 2004 27–25 51.9% #28 1,754 0 1 2006 8–12 40.0% #69 1,533 0 0
20 2005 36–29 55.4% #22 1,732 0 1 2007 6–14 30.0% #142 1,475 0 0
21 2006 45–28 61.6% #12 1,915 0 1 2008 3–6 33.3% #99 1,505 0 0
22 2007 73–26 73.7% #3 1,966 0 5 2009 9–14 39.1% #110 1,562 0 0
23 2008 63–18 77.8% #1 2,087 0 9 2010 19–12 61.3% #42 1,687 0 1
24 2009 42–19 68.9% #8 1,948 0 11 2011 28–23 54.9% #33 1,696 0 2
25 2010 35–22 61.4% #8 1,794 0 12 2012 7–19 26.9% #183 1,509 0 2
26 2011 38–22 63.3% #14 1,804 0 12 2013 3–3 50.0% #238 1,535 0 2
27 2012 31–27 53.4% #22 1,737 0 12 2014 6–10 37.5% #71 1,555 0 2
28 2013 46–21 68.7% #8 1,918 0 13 2015 11–18 37.9% #105 1,537 0 2
29 2014 38–22 63.3% #15 1,795 0 13 2016 0–2 0.0% #624 1,480 0 2
30 2015 39–21 65.0% #21 1,851 0 15 — — — — — — —
31 2016 21–19 52.5% #54 1,738 0 15 — — — — — — —
32 2017 6–19 24.0% #158 1,576 0 15 — — — — — — —