H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jelena Jankovic vs Jie Zheng H2H: 5-1

Jelena Jankovic holds a 5–1 lead over Jie Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Jelena Jankovic leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jelena Jankovic won the 2012 Birmingham semifinal 6-7(2) 7-5 6-1.

SRB Age 41 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
5 1
6 main draw meetings
CHN Age 43 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 16, 2012* Birmingham WTA 250 SF Grass Jelena Jankovic #22 6-7(2) 7-5 6-1 Jie Zheng #32 Match data
Aug 18, 2011* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R32 Hard Jelena Jankovic #14 4-6 6-3 6-1 Jie Zheng #65 Match data
Aug 31, 2008* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Jelena Jankovic #2 7-5 7-5 Jie Zheng #37 Match data
Mar 28, 2008* Miami WTA 1000 R16 Hard Jelena Jankovic #3 6-4 7-5 Jie Zheng #174 Match data
Feb 2, 2007* Tokyo WTA 1000 R16 Carpet Jelena Jankovic #10 6-4 6-0 Jie Zheng #33 Match data
Sep 22, 2005* Beijing WTA 500 R32 Hard Jie Zheng #46 7-5 4-6 7-5 Jelena Jankovic #17 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jelena Jankovic #970 #1 9,200 2,132 547 332 62.2% 0 6 0 3 6 15
Jie Zheng #961 #15 2,745 1,898 216 193 52.8% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jelena Jankovic Jie Zheng
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 1–1 50.0% #364 1,512 0 0
17 2002 2–4 33.3% #196 1,528 0 0
18 2003 4–9 30.8% #85 1,505 0 0 2002 1–1 50.0% #185 1,507 0 0
19 2004 27–25 51.9% #28 1,754 0 1 2003 7–8 46.7% #84 1,535 0 0
20 2005 36–29 55.4% #22 1,732 0 1 2004 10–17 37.0% #79 1,551 0 0
21 2006 45–28 61.6% #12 1,915 0 1 2005 24–15 61.5% #44 1,705 0 1
22 2007 73–26 73.7% #3 1,966 0 5 2006 25–16 61.0% #33 1,778 0 3
23 2008 63–18 77.8% #1 2,087 0 9 2007 7–10 41.2% #163 1,689 0 3
24 2009 42–19 68.9% #8 1,948 0 11 2008 20–10 66.7% #25 1,838 0 3
25 2010 35–22 61.4% #8 1,794 0 12 2009 27–21 56.2% #35 1,779 0 3
26 2011 38–22 63.3% #14 1,804 0 12 2010 23–18 56.1% #26 1,760 0 3
27 2012 31–27 53.4% #22 1,737 0 12 2011 18–23 43.9% #48 1,705 0 3
28 2013 46–21 68.7% #8 1,918 0 13 2012 25–23 52.1% #26 1,658 0 4
29 2014 38–22 63.3% #15 1,795 0 13 2013 17–17 50.0% #53 1,688 0 4
30 2015 39–21 65.0% #21 1,851 0 15 2014 12–13 48.0% #91 1,670 0 4
31 2016 21–19 52.5% #54 1,738 0 15 2015 0–1 0.0% #962 1,648 0 4
32 2017 6–19 24.0% #158 1,576 0 15