H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Jelena Jankovic vs Jill Craybas H2H: 3-2

Jelena Jankovic holds a 3–2 lead over Jill Craybas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Jelena Jankovic leads 2–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Jelena Jankovic won the 2012 Kuala Lumpur fourth round 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jelena Jankovic
SRB Age 41 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Jill Craybas
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 2, 2012* Kuala Lumpur WTA 250 R16 Hard Jelena Jankovic #14 6-2 6-0 Jill Craybas #146 Match data
Apr 5, 2006* Amelia Island WTA 500 R64 Clay Jill Craybas #49 2-6 7-6(8) 4-0 (ret.) Jelena Jankovic #27 Match data
Jan 18, 2006* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Jelena Jankovic #23 6-2 4-6 6-4 Jill Craybas #51 Match data
Apr 14, 2004* Charleston WTA 1000 R64 Clay Jelena Jankovic #59 6-4 3-6 6-3 Jill Craybas #52 Match data
Jan 23, 2004* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Jill Craybas #113 6-4 2-6 8-6 Jelena Jankovic #79 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jelena Jankovic #970 #1 9,200 2,132 547 332 62.2% 0 6 0 3 6 15
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,695 161 256 38.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jelena Jankovic Jill Craybas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 1–1 50.0% #364 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2002 2–4 33.3% #196 1,528 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2003 4–9 30.8% #85 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2004 27–25 51.9% #28 1,754 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2005 36–29 55.4% #22 1,732 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 2006 45–28 61.6% #12 1,915 0 1 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0
22 2007 73–26 73.7% #3 1,966 0 5 — — — — — — —
23 2008 63–18 77.8% #1 2,087 0 9 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0
24 2009 42–19 68.9% #8 1,948 0 11 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0
25 2010 35–22 61.4% #8 1,794 0 12 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0
26 2011 38–22 63.3% #14 1,804 0 12 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0
27 2012 31–27 53.4% #22 1,737 0 12 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1
28 2013 46–21 68.7% #8 1,918 0 13 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1
29 2014 38–22 63.3% #15 1,795 0 13 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,499 0 1
30 2015 39–21 65.0% #21 1,851 0 15 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,614 0 1
31 2016 21–19 52.5% #54 1,738 0 15 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,569 0 1
32 2017 6–19 24.0% #158 1,576 0 15 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2008 22–25 46.8% #64 1,575 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,592 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1
37 — — — — — — — 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,449 0 1
38 — — — — — — — 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1