H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Jelena Jankovic vs Lindsay Davenport H2H: 2-4

Lindsay Davenport holds a 4–2 lead over Jelena Jankovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 3–2 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jelena Jankovic won the 2008 Indian Wells quarterfinal 6-2 0-0 RET.

SRB Age 41 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 4
6 main draw meetings
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 15, 2008* Indian Wells WTA 1000 QF Hard Jelena Jankovic #4 6-2 0-0 (ret.) Lindsay Davenport #36 Match data
Sep 22, 2007* Beijing WTA 500 SF Hard Jelena Jankovic #3 6-3 7-5 Lindsay Davenport #154 Match data
Sep 15, 2007* Bali WTA 500 QF Hard Lindsay Davenport #234 6-4 2-6 6-2 Jelena Jankovic #3 Match data
Mar 6, 2005* Dubai WTA 500 F Hard Lindsay Davenport #1 6-4 3-6 6-4 Jelena Jankovic #28 Match data
Oct 9, 2004* Filderstadt WTA 500 QF Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 6-3 6-4 Jelena Jankovic #35 Match data
Apr 15, 2004* Charleston WTA 1000 R32 Clay Lindsay Davenport #4 7-5 6-3 Jelena Jankovic #59 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jelena Jankovic #970 #1 9,200 2,132 547 332 62.2% 0 6 0 3 6 15
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jelena Jankovic Lindsay Davenport
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0
16 2001 1–1 50.0% #364 1,512 0 0 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0
17 2002 2–4 33.3% #196 1,528 0 0 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1
18 2003 4–9 30.8% #85 1,505 0 0 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3
19 2004 27–25 51.9% #28 1,754 0 1 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4
20 2005 36–29 55.4% #22 1,732 0 1 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6
21 2006 45–28 61.6% #12 1,915 0 1 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12
22 2007 73–26 73.7% #3 1,966 0 5 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18
23 2008 63–18 77.8% #1 2,087 0 9 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25
24 2009 42–19 68.9% #8 1,948 0 11 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29
25 2010 35–22 61.4% #8 1,794 0 12 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36
26 2011 38–22 63.3% #14 1,804 0 12 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36
27 2012 31–27 53.4% #22 1,737 0 12 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37
28 2013 46–21 68.7% #8 1,918 0 13 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44
29 2014 38–22 63.3% #15 1,795 0 13 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50
30 2015 39–21 65.0% #21 1,851 0 15 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50
31 2016 21–19 52.5% #54 1,738 0 15 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52
32 2017 6–19 24.0% #158 1,576 0 15 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54