H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Jelena Jankovic vs Lourdes Domínguez Lino H2H: 4-0

Jelena Jankovic holds a 4–0 lead over Lourdes Domínguez Lino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jelena Jankovic leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jelena Jankovic won the 2013 Nuremberg quarterfinal 6-4 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jelena Jankovic
SRB Age 41 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main-draw meetings
Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Spain Age 45 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jelena Jankovic #16 6-4 6-0 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #50 Match data Jun 15, 2013* QF Nuremberg International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Jelena Jankovic #6 6-4 6-1 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #48 Match data Mar 3, 2011* R32 Monterrey Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Jelena Jankovic #17 6-0 6-1 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #41 Match data Sep 21, 2006* R32 China Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Jelena Jankovic #29 6-3 6-4 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #48 Match data Jun 28, 2006* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jelena Jankovic #970 #1 9,200 2,138 552 337 62.1% 0 6 0 2 7 15
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #1,129 #40 1,305 1,673 125 157 44.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jelena Jankovic Lourdes Domínguez Lino
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 1–1 50.0% #364 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2002 2–4 33.3% #196 1,529 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2003 4–9 30.8% #85 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2004 27–26 50.9% #28 1,745 0 1 2000 0–1 0.0% #141 1,489 0 0
20 2005 36–29 55.4% #22 1,733 0 1 2001 0–1 0.0% #378 1,479 0 0
21 2006 45–28 61.6% #12 1,925 0 1 2002 4–3 57.1% #390 1,518 0 0
22 2007 73–26 73.7% #3 1,977 0 5 2003 0–1 0.0% #319 1,503 0 0
23 2008 66–19 77.6% #1 2,091 0 9 2004 1–1 50.0% #208 1,508 0 0
24 2009 42–19 68.9% #8 1,952 0 11 2005 6–4 60.0% #72 1,553 0 0
25 2010 35–22 61.4% #8 1,797 0 12 2006 21–19 52.5% #52 1,623 0 1
26 2011 38–22 63.3% #14 1,794 0 12 2007 16–21 43.2% #71 1,557 0 1
27 2012 31–28 52.5% #22 1,732 0 12 2008 6–11 35.3% #91 1,507 0 1
28 2013 46–21 68.7% #8 1,920 0 13 2009 6–13 31.6% #134 1,477 0 1
29 2014 38–22 63.3% #15 1,797 0 13 2010 2–4 33.3% #85 1,487 0 1
30 2015 39–21 65.0% #21 1,858 0 15 2011 16–16 50.0% #79 1,574 0 2
31 2016 23–21 52.3% #54 1,730 0 15 2012 16–16 50.0% #48 1,652 0 2
32 2017 6–19 24.0% #158 1,575 0 15 2013 17–22 43.6% #69 1,620 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2014 7–11 38.9% #110 1,568 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2015 4–5 44.4% #100 1,550 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2016 3–8 27.3% #220 1,516 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jelena Jankovic Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2001 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2002 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2003 2 6 8 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 17 19 36 47.2% 6 3 9 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2005 22 18 40 55.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2006 31 17 48 64.6% 8 7 15 53.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
22 2007 38 18 56 67.9% 23 5 28 82.1% 11 2 13 84.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2008 49 15 64 76.6% 14 3 17 82.4% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2004 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2009 22 12 34 64.7% 15 4 19 78.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2005 — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2010 17 16 33 51.5% 15 5 20 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2006 7 10 17 41.2% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2011 27 15 42 64.3% 11 6 17 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 3 9 12 25.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2012 26 18 44 59.1% 1 6 7 14.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2008 0 4 4 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — —
28 2013 24 14 38 63.2% 21 6 27 77.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2009 1 3 4 25.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2014 22 14 36 61.1% 16 6 22 72.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2015 26 14 40 65.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
31 2016 18 14 32 56.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2012 10 8 18 55.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 2017 4 11 15 26.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2013 1 8 9 11.1% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 0 5 5 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
Career — 348 225 573 60.7% 146 73 219 66.7% 53 32 85 62.4% 5 7 12 41.7% — 27 59 86 31.4% 94 88 182 51.6% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jelena Jankovic Lourdes Domínguez Lino
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2001 1512 104.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.40 1–0 1–0 — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2002 1529 120.6 — — — — +38 — — 35.7% -0.79 1–1 1–1 — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2003 1488 112.5 — — — — +49 -9 — 39.3% -0.36 1–5 (17%) 0–2 — +0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 1746 139.9 -1.12 +2.19 0.989 49.7% -43 -137 -129 53.7% +0.12 8–11 (42%) 11–2 (85%) 107.5 -0.93 2000 1489 98.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.06
20 2005 1733 142.6 +1.39 +0.98 1.067 51.2% -36 -21 -3 56.8% +0.58 9–15 (38%) 3–6 (33%) 91.2 -0.92 2001 1480 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.06
21 2006 1925 155.2 +0.93 +2.16 1.062 51.3% -25 -178 -93 62.0% +0.98 16–10 (62%) 8–9 (47%) 105.8 -1.57 2002 1519 112.4 — — — — — +41 — 57.1% +0.14 — 2–1 (67%) — +0.22
22 2007 1977 166.7 +4.61 +7.29 1.259 54.9% -66 +125 -9 71.8% +1.76 15–14 (52%) 9–8 (53%) 99.5 -2.33 2003 1503 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.07
23 2008 2091 167.1 +4.57 +5.72 1.211 54.2% 0 +6 -122 72.3% +1.59 14–12 (54%) 9–6 (60%) 97.6 -0.03 2004 1509 105.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.34 1–1 0–1 — +0.01
24 2009 1953 153.9 +3.33 +4.18 1.158 53.2% +35 +106 -56 65.7% +0.99 10–10 (50%) 13–6 (68%) 96.3 +1.47 2005 1553 117.7 — — — — — +72 — 61.9% +0.38 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.23
25 2010 1797 148.2 +1.63 +4.10 1.111 52.3% -26 +268 +127 59.5% +0.69 11–5 (69%) 6–6 (50%) 98.9 +1.90 2006 1623 121.0 — — — — -68 +93 — 51.2% -0.30 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 102.8 +0.22
26 2011 1795 152.5 +3.98 +4.60 1.215 54.2% -5 +179 — 63.5% +1.32 6–15 (29%) 3–2 (60%) 89.2 +2.37 2007 1558 113.3 — — — — -56 +110 — 43.2% -0.49 4–3 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -0.29
27 2012 1733 140.2 +0.76 +2.74 1.061 51.2% +44 +108 +82 51.6% +0.25 6–10 (38%) 8–11 (42%) 90.7 -0.18 2008 1508 107.1 — — — — -48 +107 — 37.8% -1.11 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — -0.03
28 2013 1921 155.5 +1.91 +3.65 1.103 52.2% -10 +25 — 63.4% +0.98 17–10 (63%) 12–6 (67%) 108.0 +2.23 2009 1477 108.0 — — — — -35 +83 — 37.8% -0.82 2–5 (29%) 2–5 (29%) 95.2 +0.87
29 2014 1797 152.0 +3.44 +3.23 1.165 53.1% +32 +152 — 63.1% +1.09 6–8 (43%) 5–9 (36%) 91.3 +1.30 2010 1487 102.6 — — — — 0 — — 35.7% -1.36 1–1 0–1 — +0.13
30 2015 1858 140.4 +1.72 +0.71 1.039 50.5% +8 +11 -27 61.7% +0.75 15–6 (71%) 7–5 (58%) 106.0 +0.52 2011 1575 121.5 — — — — -73 0 +20 50.0% +0.11 6–6 (50%) 1–7 (13%) 95.2 +0.42
31 2016 1730 132.2 +1.48 +2.78 1.125 52.4% +42 +35 +71 56.0% +0.52 4–12 (25%) 4–5 (44%) 86.5 +1.30 2012 1653 124.6 — — — — -17 -96 — 54.3% +0.04 2–6 (25%) 4–1 (80%) 100.6 0.00
32 2017 1575 121.7 -1.62 -1.81 0.871 47.5% +83 +113 +164 34.4% -0.87 2–9 (18%) 1–4 (20%) 88.8 -0.72 2013 1620 121.2 — — — — -86 +113 — 41.3% -0.81 10–8 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 103.9 -1.33
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1569 107.5 — — — — -102 +137 — 40.0% -0.89 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.57
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1550 113.7 -1.03 +0.35 0.984 50.1% — +126 — 50.0% -0.05 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — +0.51
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1517 97.5 -3.20 -2.29 0.761 44.1% -86 +117 — 25.0% -1.75 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.18
Career — 2139 156.2 +2.59 +3.80 1.133 52.7% -3 +72 -8 61.1% +0.87 142–153 (48%) 101–88 (53%) 93.6 +0.58 — 1674 120.0 -2.29 -1.18 0.851 46.6% -55 +78 +20 45.2% -0.48 35–45 (44%) 26–29 (47%) 98.8 +0.46

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.