H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jelena Jankovic vs Marion Bartoli H2H: 4-5

Marion Bartoli holds a 5–4 lead over Jelena Jankovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Marion Bartoli leads 4–2 on hard courts, while Jelena Jankovic leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Jelena Jankovic won the 2009 Tokyo quarterfinal 6-4 6-3.

SRB Age 41 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 5
9 main draw meetings
FRA Age 41 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 3, 2009* Tokyo WTA 1000 QF Hard Jelena Jankovic #8 6-4 6-3 Marion Bartoli #14 Match data
Aug 1, 2009* Stanford WTA 500 QF Hard Marion Bartoli #14 3-6 7-6(3) 6-3 Jelena Jankovic #6 Match data
Jan 27, 2009* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Marion Bartoli #17 6-1 6-4 Jelena Jankovic #1 Match data
Nov 5, 2007 WTA Tour Championships WTA Finals RR Hard Marion Bartoli #10 6-1 1-0 (ret.) Jelena Jankovic #3 Match data
Jul 3, 2007* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Marion Bartoli #19 3-6 7-5 6-3 Jelena Jankovic #3 Match data
Jun 4, 2007* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Jelena Jankovic #5 6-1 6-1 Marion Bartoli #21 Match data
Sep 22, 2006* Beijing WTA 500 R16 Hard Jelena Jankovic #17 6-3 6-2 Marion Bartoli #26 Match data
May 31, 2006* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Jelena Jankovic #32 2-6 6-4 6-1 Marion Bartoli #29 Match data
Jan 8, 2005* Auckland WTA 250 QF Hard Marion Bartoli #41 3-6 7-6(6) 6-1 Jelena Jankovic #28 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jelena Jankovic #970 #1 9,200 2,132 547 332 62.2% 0 6 0 3 6 15
Marion Bartoli #13 #7 5,160 1,996 402 267 60.1% 1 0 0 5 2 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jelena Jankovic Marion Bartoli
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 1–1 50.0% #364 1,512 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #307 1,483 0 0
17 2002 2–4 33.3% #196 1,528 0 0 2002 2–3 40.0% #104 1,511 0 0
18 2003 4–9 30.8% #85 1,505 0 0 2003 20–21 48.8% #58 1,643 0 0
19 2004 27–25 51.9% #28 1,754 0 1 2004 26–23 53.1% #41 1,666 0 0
20 2005 36–29 55.4% #22 1,732 0 1 2005 26–25 51.0% #37 1,632 0 0
21 2006 45–28 61.6% #12 1,915 0 1 2006 45–28 61.6% #18 1,800 0 3
22 2007 73–26 73.7% #3 1,966 0 5 2007 47–31 60.3% #10 1,873 0 3
23 2008 63–18 77.8% #1 2,087 0 9 2008 30–26 53.6% #17 1,809 0 3
24 2009 42–19 68.9% #8 1,948 0 11 2009 46–22 67.6% #11 1,882 0 5
25 2010 35–22 61.4% #8 1,794 0 12 2010 36–21 63.2% #16 1,820 0 5
26 2011 38–22 63.3% #14 1,804 0 12 2011 60–26 69.8% #9 1,907 0 7
27 2012 31–27 53.4% #22 1,737 0 12 2012 41–25 62.1% #11 1,814 0 7
28 2013 46–21 68.7% #8 1,918 0 13 2013 23–15 60.5% #13 1,808 1 8
29 2014 38–22 63.3% #15 1,795 0 13
30 2015 39–21 65.0% #21 1,851 0 15
31 2016 21–19 52.5% #54 1,738 0 15
32 2017 6–19 24.0% #158 1,576 0 15