H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jelena Jankovic vs Silvia Farina Elia H2H: 1-2
Silvia Farina Elia holds a 2–1 lead over Jelena Jankovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Silvia Farina Elia leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jelena Jankovic won the 2005 Dubai fourth round 4-6 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SRB
Age 41
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 54
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2005* | Dubai | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Jelena Jankovic | 4-6 7-5 6-1 | Silvia Farina Elia | Match data |
| May 26, 2004* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Silvia Farina Elia | 4-6 6-0 6-2 | Jelena Jankovic | Match data |
| Mar 10, 2001* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Silvia Farina Elia | 6-2 6-4 | Jelena Jankovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jelena Jankovic | #970 | #1 | 9,200 | 2,132 | 547 | 332 | 62.2% | 0 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 15 |
| Silvia Farina Elia | #32 | #11 | 1,838 | 1,943 | 365 | 309 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jelena Jankovic | Silvia Farina Elia | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #364 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2003 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #85 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #194 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2004 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #28 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 36–29 | 55.4% | #22 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 45–28 | 61.6% | #12 | 1,915 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #85 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 73–26 | 73.7% | #3 | 1,966 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #52 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 63–18 | 77.8% | #1 | 2,087 | 0 | 9 | 1995 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 42–19 | 68.9% | #8 | 1,948 | 0 | 11 | 1996 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #34 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #8 | 1,794 | 0 | 12 | 1997 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #43 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #14 | 1,804 | 0 | 12 | 1998 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #19 | 1,901 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #22 | 1,737 | 0 | 12 | 1999 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #26 | 1,782 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2013 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #8 | 1,918 | 0 | 13 | 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #63 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2014 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,795 | 0 | 13 | 2001 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #14 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2015 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #21 | 1,851 | 0 | 15 | 2002 | 42–28 | 60.0% | #17 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2016 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #54 | 1,738 | 0 | 15 | 2003 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #24 | 1,719 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2017 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #158 | 1,576 | 0 | 15 | 2004 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #20 | 1,770 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #32 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 |