H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Jelena Kostanic Tosic vs Amanda Hopmans H2H: 0-2

Amanda Hopmans holds a 2–0 lead over Jelena Kostanic Tosic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Amanda Hopmans leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Amanda Hopmans won the 2000 Warsaw round of 16 6-2 6-3.

CRO Age 45 Left-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 2
2 main-draw meetings
NED Age 50 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amanda Hopmans #98 6-2 6-3 Jelena Kostanic Tosic #92 Match data May 12, 2000* R16 Warsaw Tier IV modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Amanda Hopmans #97 6-2 6-1 Jelena Kostanic Tosic #88 Match data Apr 20, 2000* R32 Budapest Tier IV modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jelena Kostanic Tosic #937 #32 900 1,709 112 152 42.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Amanda Hopmans #978 #72 411 1,603 23 36 39.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jelena Kostanic Tosic Amanda Hopmans
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1998 1–2 33.3% #240 1,490 0 0
17 1999 4–5 44.4% #97 1,512 0 0
18 2000 10–13 43.5% #114 1,523 0 0
19 2001 4–4 50.0% #131 1,559 0 0
20 2002 14–17 45.2% #70 1,571 0 0
21 2003 16–20 44.4% #66 1,621 0 0
22 2004 22–26 45.8% #35 1,665 0 0
23 2005 11–21 34.4% #87 1,546 0 0 1999 9–13 40.9% #83 1,549 0 0
24 2006 19–18 51.4% #51 1,576 0 0 2000 12–16 42.9% #103 1,538 0 0
25 2007 10–17 37.0% #103 1,534 0 0 2001 2–7 22.2% #162 1,518 0 0
26 2008 1–5 16.7% #114 1,512 0 0
28 2010 0–4 0.0% #830 1,472 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jelena Kostanic Tosic Amanda Hopmans
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1998 1 2 3 33.3%
17 1999 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 2000 4 3 7 57.1% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
20 2002 7 8 15 46.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2003 6 9 15 40.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 2004 11 18 29 37.9% 11 6 17 64.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2005 2 10 12 16.7% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 1 1 2 50.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
24 2006 18 14 32 56.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2000 3 5 8 37.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2007 9 11 20 45.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 2010 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 58 81 139 41.7% 51 55 106 48.1% 1 11 12 8.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 10 15 33.3% 9 17 26 34.6% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jelena Kostanic Tosic Amanda Hopmans
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1998 1491 103.8 +41 42.9% +0.43 0–1 0–1 +0.18
17 1999 1512 116.4 +24 +37 45.5% -0.14 2–2 (50%) 0–1 +0.26
18 2000 1524 108.3 +37 +30 42.0% -0.68 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 105.1 +0.85
19 2001 1560 116.2 +73 47.1% +0.18 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 101.0 -0.13
20 2002 1571 111.3 -20 +34 42.5% -0.31 8–3 (73%) 2–5 (29%) 105.9 +0.28
21 2003 1622 120.1 -1.74 -2.49 0.739 43.5% -56 +59 45.1% -0.46 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 97.7 -0.06
22 2004 1666 129.7 -1.40 -1.09 0.823 45.7% -81 +96 45.4% -0.19 9–7 (56%) 6–5 (55%) 105.6 -0.69
23 2005 1547 120.0 -0.58 -1.27 0.864 46.7% -47 +195 37.0% -0.73 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 99.4 +0.09 1999 1549 120.0 +66 -49 +37 40.4% -0.70 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 98.1 -0.43
24 2006 1577 119.3 -2.62 -2.72 0.804 45.9% +30 -175 50.6% -0.05 6–5 (55%) 3–2 (60%) 100.9 +1.44 2000 1539 112.0 +42 -22 +11 49.2% -0.03 2–5 (29%) 1–4 (20%) 93.0 +1.81
25 2007 1534 105.5 -0.32 -3.82 0.871 47.4% +40 +66 38.6% -1.12 3–2 (60%) 0–2 -0.47 2001 1518 107.4 +27 -16 25.0% -2.00 1–1 0–1 -0.79
26 2008 1513 110.2 +2.02 -2.68 0.696 44.8% +50 22.2% -1.78 1–0 2–0 -0.46
28 2010 1472 103.1 -1.62 -2.01 0.660 40.8% 0.0% -3.25 -0.15
Career 1710 121.9 -0.96 -2.67 0.809 45.8% -15 +80 -175 42.8% -0.47 42–33 (56%) 24–27 (47%) 105.1 +0.43 1604 115.7 +47 -30 +24 42.1% -0.59 5–9 (36%) 2–7 (22%) 91.2 +1.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.